Author
Listed:
- Lin, Kuiwu
- Chen, Bin
- Liu, Zhipeng
- Fu, Ling
- Hao, Senran
- Li, Junbiao
- Zhang, Yuan
- Xie, Heping
Abstract
With global efforts to reduce carbon emissions speeding up and the quest for sustainable energy, hydrogen has become a highly promising zero‑carbon energy option. This review systematically assesses mature and rapidly developing hydrogen production technologies—including Fossil fuel-based processes, industrial by-product recovery, and water electrolysis methods, analyzing them from the perspectives of efficiency, carbon emissions, and cost. We compare technical principles and performance metrics of leading technologies such as steam methane reforming (SMR, 0.8–6 $/kg), coal gasification (11–25 kg CO2/kg), and advanced electrolysis systems like PEM, AEM, and SOEC (e.g.,3.6 kWh/Nm3), highlighting their respective maturity, environmental footprints, and scalability. Our analysis emphasizes that while Fossil fuel-based methods currently dominate due to cost advantages, their sustainability hinges on CCUS integration. In contrast, By-product hydrogen presents a low-carbon, cost-effective interim solution. Water electrolysis powered by renewables holds the greatest long-term promise, but remains constrained by high cost (up to 7 $/kg) and technological barriers. We identify key technical bottlenecks—including catalyst degradation and membrane instability—that must be addressed via innovations in materials, integration, and renewable coupling. By presenting a structured comparison of current and emerging hydrogen production technologies, this review offers clear guidance for targeted innovation and provides actionable insights for researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders to accelerate the development of cost-competitive, low-emission hydrogen production systems aligned with global climate goals.
Suggested Citation
Lin, Kuiwu & Chen, Bin & Liu, Zhipeng & Fu, Ling & Hao, Senran & Li, Junbiao & Zhang, Yuan & Xie, Heping, 2025.
"Toward efficient, low-carbon, and Cost-effective hydrogen production shifting from fossil fuel-based to renewable water electrolysis: A perspective and outlook,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 401(PA).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:appene:v:401:y:2025:i:pa:s0306261925013911
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126661
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:401:y:2025:i:pa:s0306261925013911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.