IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v400y2025ics0306261925010220.html

Hydrogen network topology optimization by MINLP: Comparing retrofit with new-built design scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Jamali, D.H.
  • Ganzer, C.
  • Sundmacher, K.

Abstract

Rapid and cost-effective development of a hydrogen distribution infrastructure is an indispensable element of the transition from the current fossil-based to a completely renewables-based energy supply system. In addition to sustainable hydrogen production, e.g. by water electrolysis, biogas reforming or biomass gasification, a comprehensive system for the transport, storage, and distribution of green hydrogen must be established and adapted to specific net-zero pathways. The mathematical modeling and optimization of hydrogen transport in pipeline networks have often been overlooked or simplified in the existing literature. Such simplifications can lead to inaccuracies in energetic and/or economic evaluations, and even jeopardize the feasibility of a model-based network design. In the present work, we develop a mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) approach for the topology optimization of a hydrogen pipeline network. It minimizes the total installed cost (TIC) while ensuring gas pipeline hydraulics, logical, and safety constraints. The Irish gas network (re-)design is considered as a case study for this extensible MINLP model. For covering both short- and long-term objectives in topology optimization, three different hydrogen demand scenarios are investigated. In addition, different network design scenarios are considered to assess the feasibility and benefits of different topologies. The results of this case study show that repurposing the entire existing Irish natural gas network is not the most cost-effective solution. Importantly, the evaluation of multiple demand scenarios reveals the limits of hydrogen demand that can be accommodated by the current pipeline infrastructure. This raises questions regarding the design of a hydrogen network facing an increasing demand over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamali, D.H. & Ganzer, C. & Sundmacher, K., 2025. "Hydrogen network topology optimization by MINLP: Comparing retrofit with new-built design scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 400(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:400:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925010220
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925010220
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parker, Nathan, 2004. "Using Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Costs to Estimate Hydrogen Pipeline Costs," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9m40m75r, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. André, Jean & Auray, Stéphane & Brac, Jean & De Wolf, Daniel & Maisonnier, Guy & Ould-Sidi, Mohamed-Mahmoud & Simonnet, Antoine, 2013. "Design and dimensioning of hydrogen transmission pipeline networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 239-251.
    3. Parker, Nathan, 2004. "Using Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Costs to Estimate Hydrogen Pipeline Costs," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2gk0j8kq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. William E. Hart & Carl D. Laird & Jean-Paul Watson & David L. Woodruff & Gabriel A. Hackebeil & Bethany L. Nicholson & John D. Siirola, 2017. "Pyomo — Optimization Modeling in Python," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-319-58821-6, March.
    5. Jack Brimberg & Pierre Hansen & Keh-Wei Lin & Nenad Mladenović & MichÈle Breton, 2003. "An Oil Pipeline Design Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 228-239, April.
    6. Tsiklios, C. & Hermesmann, M. & Müller, T.E., 2022. "Hydrogen transport in large-scale transmission pipeline networks: Thermodynamic and environmental assessment of repurposed and new pipeline configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    7. Hermesmann, M. & Grübel, K. & Scherotzki, L. & Müller, T.E., 2021. "Promising pathways: The geographic and energetic potential of power-to-x technologies based on regeneratively obtained hydrogen," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martinez-Rodriguez, Miguel & Chyong, Chi Kong & Fitzgerald, Timothy & Vazquez, Miguel & Hidalgo, Antonio, 2026. "Pipeline regulation for hydrogen: choosing between paths and networks," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    2. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2013. "Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification (UCG) in Western Canada with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) for upgrading bitumen from oil sands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 428-440.
    3. Oluwatayo Babatope Ojo & Abdelrahman Hegab & Pericles Pilidis, 2025. "Impact of Compressor Station Availability on the Techno-Economics of Natural Gas Pipeline Transportation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Lin, Zhenhong & Fan, Yueyue & Ogden, Joan M & Chen, Chien-Wei, 2008. "Optimized Pathways for Regional H2 Infrastructure Transitions: A Case Study for Southern California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9mk5n8jn, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    5. Hamidzadeh, Zeinab & Sattari, Sourena & Soltanieh, Mohammad & Vatani, Ali, 2020. "Development of a multi-objective decision-making model to recover flare gases in a multi flare gases zone," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Styn, Robert & Reichelt, Hannes Jakob & Peters, Ralf & Müller, Thomas Ernst, 2025. "Techno-economic assessment of hythane-fueled industrial SOFC systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    7. Nhuchhen, Daya R. & Sit, Song P. & Layzell, David B., 2022. "Decarbonization of cement production in a hydrogen economy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    8. Myers Jaffe , Amy & Dominguez-Faus , Rosa & Ogden, Joan & Parker, Nathan C. & Scheitrum , Daniel & McDonald, Zane & Fan , Yueyue & Durbin , Tom & Karavalakis, George & Wilcock, Justin & Miller , Marsh, 2017. "The Potential to Build Current Natural Gas Infrastructure to Accommodate the Future Conversion to Near-Zero Transportation Technology," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt2tp3n5pm, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Parker, Nathan C, 2007. "Optimizing the Design of Biomass Hydrogen Supply Chains Using Real-World Spatial Distributions: A Case Study Using California Rice Straw," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8sp9n37c, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. Bastian Wei{ss}enburger & Lukas Karkossa & Annegret Stephan & Russell McKenna, 2025. "Location matters: Exploring the effects of regional geographical and political characteristics on hydrogen pipeline costs globally," Papers 2505.01124, arXiv.org.
    11. Jarvis, Sean M. & Samsatli, Sheila, 2018. "Technologies and infrastructures underpinning future CO2 value chains: A comprehensive review and comparative analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 46-68.
    12. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2023. "Socio-technical barriers to domestic hydrogen futures: Repurposing pipelines, policies, and public perceptions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    13. McCollum, David L & Ogden, Joan M, 2006. "Techno-Economic Models for Carbon Dioxide Compression, Transport, and Storage & Correlations for Estimating Carbon Dioxide Density and Viscosity," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1zg00532, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Tarufelli, Brittany & Snyder, Brian & Dismukes, David, 2021. "The Potential Impact of the U.S. Carbon Capture and Storage Tax Credit Expansion on the Economic Feasibility of Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    15. Olateju, Babatunde & Kumar, Amit, 2016. "A techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from hydropower in Western Canada for the upgrading of bitumen from oil sands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 604-614.
    16. Zhang, Qi & Liu, Jiangfeng & Wang, Ge & Gao, Zhihui, 2024. "A new optimization model for carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) layout based on high-resolution geological variability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    17. Samsatli, Sheila & Samsatli, Nouri J., 2019. "The role of renewable hydrogen and inter-seasonal storage in decarbonising heat – Comprehensive optimisation of future renewable energy value chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 854-893.
    18. Massol, Olivier & Tchung-Ming, Stéphane & Banal-Estañol, Albert, 2015. "Joining the CCS club! The economics of CO2 pipeline projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 259-275.
    19. Bondita Robidas & Subrata Borgohain Gogoi, 2024. "Economic analysis of transportation of crude oil of Upper Assam Basin through pipeline," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(8), pages 1-30, August.
    20. Lin, Zhenhong & Chen, Chien-Wei & Fan, Yueyue & Ogden, Joan M., 2008. "Optimized Pathways for Regional H2 Infrastructure Transitions: The Least-Cost Hydrogen for Southern California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0333714s, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:400:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925010220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.