IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v399y2025ics0306261925012413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of heating and cooling solutions for residential use: Energy, environmental, and economic perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Kurses, Mustafa
  • Olympios, Andreas V.
  • Harraz, Asmaa A.
  • Xu, Jingyuan

Abstract

This paper examines the techno-economic performance of domestic heating and cooling technologies across different climates. The novelty lies in the comprehensive assessment of a broad range of technological options using advanced thermodynamic and component-costing models. A holistic, like-for-like comparison is conducted for combinations of technologies that meet all residential energy needs – space heating, domestic hot water, space cooling, and electricity. Nine different system combinations are proposed, including natural gas boilers, photovoltaic systems, photovoltaic-thermal systems, solar thermal collectors, hydrogen boilers, air-to-water heat pumps, diffusion absorption refrigeration systems, and air-to-air air conditioners. These are analyzed for a typical single-family house under three distinct European climates: Athens (Greece), Strasbourg (France), and Helsinki (Finland), focusing on energy, economic, and environmental factors. From an economic perspective, the integrated photovoltaic - heat pump system configuration consistently has the lowest levelized cost of energy (LCOE) across all locations, ranging from 0.15 €/kWh in Athens to 0.20 €/kWh in Strasbourg. The photovoltaic-thermal – heat pump system configuration follows with a slightly higher LCOE than the photovoltaic – heat pump system (by 0.05–0.06 €/kWh) due to its higher initial costs. In general, solar integrated systems have an LCOE that is 0.10–0.20 €/kWh lower compared to the same systems that do not use solar energy. The payback time for the photovoltaic – heat pump system ranges from 4.65 years in Finland to 8.95 years in Greece. Standalone heat pump cost savings vary significantly and are lowest in Athens (403 €/year) and highest in Helsinki (2560 €/year) when compared to gas boilers, influenced by the regional electricity-gas price ratio, which is higher in Greece. However, photovoltaic and photovoltaic-thermal systems achieve a higher emission reduction in Athens (e.g., 4.70 tons of CO2,eq/year for the photovoltaic – heat pump system), due to the carbon-intensive grid of Greece. Although hydrogen boilers show a high emission reduction in Strasbourg and Helsinki (4.27 tons of CO2,eq/year), they exhibit higher LCOE than other systems (> 0.60 €/kWh), with their future viability depending on green hydrogen production costs. Overall, this study provides insights into residential energy systems across diverse climates, highlighting the importance of context-specific technology choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurses, Mustafa & Olympios, Andreas V. & Harraz, Asmaa A. & Xu, Jingyuan, 2025. "Comparative analysis of heating and cooling solutions for residential use: Energy, environmental, and economic perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 399(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:399:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925012413
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925012413
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:399:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925012413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.