IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v399y2025ics0306261925012140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization framework for multi-objective energy management strategy in hybrid electric vehicles integrating explainable artificial intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Zhiyuan
  • Wang, Hu
  • He, Guanzhang
  • Chen, Yong
  • Li, Zihou
  • Zheng, Zunqing
  • Yao, Mingfa
  • Zhang, Song
  • Wang, Hao

Abstract

This study presents a multi-objective optimization (MOO) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) integrated framework for establishing MOO strategies in hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) and analyzing the decision-making patterns of the system. Specifically, the study first establishes a power-split HEV model and incorporates fuel consumption, electricity consumption, battery degradation, and the number of engine start-stops into the system evaluation metrics. Subsequently, the dynamic programming (DP) algorithm is employed to develop an offline globally optimal multi-objective strategy based on the multi-indicator vehicle model, and the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) is used to perform MOO of the strategy's cost function. By combining the cognition-driven analytical hierarchy process (AHP) decision-making method with the data-driven technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method, the AHP-TOPSIS decision-making method is used to select the optimal solution from the Pareto frontier. Tree-based XAI methods are introduced, employing mean decrease impurity (MDI) and partial dependence plots (PDP) to analyze the interaction mechanisms among the four objectives during the decision-making process. A double-layer random forest (RF) energy management strategy is constructed, combining a five-fold cross-validated RF pattern recognition model with an engine power prediction model based on the optimal solution dataset. The results demonstrate that the multi-objective strategy exhibits better overall performance compared to single-objective strategies. The proposed double-layer RF strategy reduces fuel consumption by 1.8 %, maintains similar electricity consumption, decreases battery degradation by 7.1 %, and reduces the number of engine start-stops by 82.1 % compared to a rule-based (RB) strategy, with minimal deviation from the DP strategy. This validates the superior performance of the strategy in multi-objective control processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Zhiyuan & Wang, Hu & He, Guanzhang & Chen, Yong & Li, Zihou & Zheng, Zunqing & Yao, Mingfa & Zhang, Song & Wang, Hao, 2025. "Optimization framework for multi-objective energy management strategy in hybrid electric vehicles integrating explainable artificial intelligence," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 399(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:399:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925012140
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925012140
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:399:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925012140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.