Author
Listed:
- Gyandoh, Edmund
- Gomez, Jamie
Abstract
This comprehensive review synthesizes current research to systematically evaluate the viability of Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA) and Lignocellulosic Biomass Conversion (LCBC) pathways for sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production, with additional comparison to emerging battery-electric propulsion systems. The analysis reveals that most techno-economic assessments disproportionately emphasize capital investment and feedstock costs, while critically underrepresenting transportation logistics and co-product valorization – factors shown here to reduce minimum selling price (MFSP) by up to 67 %. Statistical analysis (χ2 = 141.6, p < 0.0001) confirms this research bias. Yield optimization emerges as an effective strategy for lowering MFSP, surpassing plant capacity expansion, with HEFA pathways achieving higher average SAF yields (62 % vs. 57 % for LCBC) and superior energy efficiency (as low as 19.6 kWh/MT feedstock/h for HEFA compared to up to 620.7 kWh/MT for LCBC). However, LCBC offers greater carbon neutrality, achieving up to 94 % greenhouse gas reduction and lower lifecycle emissions. The review introduces a comprehensive efficiency metric that incorporates all significant energy inputs – including hydrogen, natural gas, steam, and indirect energy for feedstock logistics – as well as greenhouse gas emissions, providing a more accurate assessment of process and environmental performance. Catalyst innovation and policy incentives are identified as decisive levers, with the potential to reduce SAF production costs by up to 26 % and increase project profitability by over 50 % respectively. These findings establish a robust framework for SAF pathway assessment and optimization, highlighting the need for future research and policy to prioritize advanced feedstock processing, supply chain optimization, co-product valorization, and integrated techno-economic and sustainability modeling to accelerate the deployment of cost-competitive, scalable SAFs and support aviation industry's decarbonization goals.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:399:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925011511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.