IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v398y2025ics030626192501133x.html

Microreactor-liquid metal battery system in energy markets: An evaluation of potential costs, technology, and policy impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Cho, So-Bin
  • Root, Sam J.
  • Saeed, Rami M.
  • Olowu, Temitayo O.
  • Shigrekar, Amey
  • Westover, Tyler L.

Abstract

Microreactors represent an emerging innovation in the nuclear industry; yet have been overshadowed by their high capital costs. With the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), new opportunities have emerged to improve the economics of microreactor systems. This work examines liquid metal batteries (LMB) as a value-adding technology as part of microreactor-LMB systems within three U.S. electricity markets: ERCOT, PJM, and MISO. Our investigation considers key uncertainties: the cost of microreactors, the performance of LMBs, and the eligible tax credit levels. To this end, we use a dispatch optimization to trace not only the changes in system economics but also to provide a granular picture of energy delivery within the systems. We find that even with favorable costs for microreactors, significant regional variations in the project sizing and returns exist across the markets. Our heuristic method identifies their non-electric application potentials beyond electricity and technical requirements to maximize returns. The results suggest that 12–39 % of reactor heat could be cost-effectively diverted to produce more valuable by-products in U.S. markets. Including the impacts of tax credits, we establish the outcomes of each provision with varying rates. Coupling an LMB to a microreactor consistently improves the net present value of a microreactor compared to its standalone operation. For reasonable assumed conditions, we quantify a heterogeneous impact of round-trip efficiency (RTE) and extended LMB service life across the three markets—a one-year extension in LMB service life is roughly equivalent to a 2.11 % improvement in RTE for ERCOT, 1.16 % for PJM, and 1.04 % for MISO.

Suggested Citation

  • Cho, So-Bin & Root, Sam J. & Saeed, Rami M. & Olowu, Temitayo O. & Shigrekar, Amey & Westover, Tyler L., 2025. "Microreactor-liquid metal battery system in energy markets: An evaluation of potential costs, technology, and policy impacts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 398(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:398:y:2025:i:c:s030626192501133x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192501133X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Dongwei & Jafari, Mehdi & Botterud, Audun & Sakti, Apurba, 2022. "Strategic energy storage investments: A case study of the CAISO electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    2. John Bistline & Geoffrey Blanford & Maxwell Brown & Dallas Burtraw & Maya Domeshek & Jamil Farbes & Allen Fawcett & Anne Hamilton & Jesse Jenkins & Ryan Jones & Ben King & Hannah Kolus & John Larsen &, 2023. "Emissions and Energy Impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act," Papers 2307.01443, arXiv.org.
    3. Pusceddu, Elian & Zakeri, Behnam & Castagneto Gissey, Giorgio, 2021. "Synergies between energy arbitrage and fast frequency response for battery energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. John E. T. Bistline & Neil R. Mehrotra & Catherine Wolfram, 2023. "Economic Implications of the Climate Provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 54(1 (Spring), pages 77-182.
    5. Epiney, A. & Rabiti, C. & Talbot, P. & Alfonsi, A., 2020. "Economic analysis of a nuclear hybrid energy system in a stochastic environment including wind turbines in an electricity grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Jia Zhou & Hany Abdel-Khalik & Paul Talbot & Cristian Rabiti, 2021. "A Hybrid Energy System Workflow for Energy Portfolio Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    7. Kangli Wang & Kai Jiang & Brice Chung & Takanari Ouchi & Paul J. Burke & Dane A. Boysen & David J. Bradwell & Hojong Kim & Ulrich Muecke & Donald R. Sadoway, 2014. "Lithium–antimony–lead liquid metal battery for grid-level energy storage," Nature, Nature, vol. 514(7522), pages 348-350, October.
    8. Zafirakis, Dimitrios & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J. & Baiocchi, Giovanni & Daskalakis, Georgios, 2016. "The value of arbitrage for energy storage: Evidence from European electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 971-986.
    9. Frew, Bethany A. & Jacobson, Mark Z., 2016. "Temporal and spatial tradeoffs in power system modeling with assumptions about storage: An application of the POWER model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P1), pages 198-213.
    10. Eric Dahlgren & Caner Göçmen & Klaus Lackner & Garrett van Ryzin, 2013. "Small Modular Infrastructure," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 231-264.
    11. Bradbury, Kyle & Pratson, Lincoln & Patiño-Echeverri, Dalia, 2014. "Economic viability of energy storage systems based on price arbitrage potential in real-time U.S. electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 512-519.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Yang & Odukomaiya, Adewale & Kassaee, Saiid & O’Connor, Patrick & Momen, Ayyoub M. & Liu, Xiaobing & Smith, Brennan T., 2019. "Preliminary analysis of market potential for a hydropneumatic ground-level integrated diverse energy storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1237-1247.
    2. Wu, Wei & Lin, Boqiang, 2018. "Application value of energy storage in power grid: A special case of China electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1191-1199.
    3. Benjamin Boecker & Christoph Weber, "undated". "Thesenpapier: A primer about storage in bottom-up models of future energy systems. Fundamentals of storage operation and investment in competitive long-term equilibria," EWL Working Papers 2002, University of Duisburg-Essen, Chair for Management Science and Energy Economics.
    4. Csereklyei, Zsuzsanna & Kallies, Anne & Diaz Valdivia, Andres, 2021. "The status of and opportunities for utility-scale battery storage in Australia: A regulatory and market perspective," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Petr Spodniak, Valentin Bertsch, and Mel Devine, 2021. "The Profitability of Energy Storage in European Electricity Markets," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 5).
    6. Lin, Boqiang & Wu, Wei & Bai, Mengqi & Xie, Chunping & Radcliffe, Jonathan, 2019. "Liquid air energy storage: Price arbitrage operations and sizing optimization in the GB real-time electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 647-655.
    7. Stamatios K. Chrysikopoulos & Panos T. Chountalas & Dimitrios A. Georgakellos & Athanasios G. Lagodimos, 2024. "Green Certificates Research: Bibliometric Assessment of Current State and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-45, January.
    8. Lin, Boqiang & Wu, Wei, 2017. "Economic viability of battery energy storage and grid strategy: A special case of China electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 423-434.
    9. Topalović, Zejneba & Haas, Reinhard & Sayer, Marlene, 2024. "Economic benefits of PHS and Li-ion storage. Study cases: Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    10. Mercier, Thomas & Olivier, Mathieu & De Jaeger, Emmanuel, 2023. "The value of electricity storage arbitrage on day-ahead markets across Europe," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    11. Dowling, Alexander W. & Kumar, Ranjeet & Zavala, Victor M., 2017. "A multi-scale optimization framework for electricity market participation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 147-164.
    12. Tiruwork B. Tibebu & Eric Hittinger & Qing Miao & Eric Williams, 2024. "Adoption Model Choice Affects the Optimal Subsidy for Residential Solar," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, February.
    13. John K. Kaldellis, 2025. "Long-Term Analysis of Hydropower’s Pivotal Role in Sustainable Future of Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-27, April.
    14. Megy, Camille & Massol, Olivier, 2023. "Is Power-to-Gas always beneficial? The implications of ownership structure," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    15. Nitsch, Felix & Deissenroth-Uhrig, Marc & Schimeczek, Christoph & Bertsch, Valentin, 2021. "Economic evaluation of battery storage systems bidding on day-ahead and automatic frequency restoration reserves markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    16. Lisa Göransson & Caroline Granfeldt & Ann-Brith Strömberg, 2021. "Management of Wind Power Variations in Electricity System Investment Models," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 1-30, June.
    17. Waterson, Michael, 2017. "The characteristics of electricity storage, renewables and markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 466-473.
    18. McConnell, Dylan & Forcey, Tim & Sandiford, Mike, 2015. "Estimating the value of electricity storage in an energy-only wholesale market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 422-432.
    19. Fries, Steven, 2023. "Sequencing decarbonization policies to manage their macroeconomic impacts," INET Oxford Working Papers 2023-26, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    20. Yi, Zonggen & Luo, Yusheng & Westover, Tyler & Katikaneni, Sravya & Ponkiya, Binaka & Sah, Suba & Mahmud, Sadab & Raker, David & Javaid, Ahmad & Heben, Michael J. & Khanna, Raghav, 2022. "Deep reinforcement learning based optimization for a tightly coupled nuclear renewable integrated energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:398:y:2025:i:c:s030626192501133x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.