IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v396y2025ics0306261925010049.html

Environmental and economic assessment of electric ferries with different lithium-ion battery technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Kanchiralla, Fayas Malik
  • Grunditz, Emma
  • Nordelöf, Anders
  • Brynolf, Selma
  • Wikner, Evelina

Abstract

Electrification of passenger ferries is an important strategy for reducing the emission of greenhouse gases and air pollutants from domestic shipping. Although several battery electric ferries are currently operational, there is still a lack of information on how different lithium-ion battery chemistries and sizing will affect environmental impact and overall cost competitiveness. This study compares the environmental impact and economic performance of using varying charging strategies for two different battery types (defined by the active material of the positive electrode – lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide or lithium iron phosphate) for electric ferries using life cycle assessment and life cycle costing. The results demonstrate that, compared to conventional marine gas oil-powered ferries, fully electric ferries offer more than 90 % reduction in contributions to climate change, while biodiesel offers around 65 % reduction. This is despite the fact that the production of batteries and other electric powertrain components causes an increase in greenhouse gas emissions from ferry manufacturing, compared to the marine gas oil ferry option. Battery electric ferries also significantly reduce other impacts like acidification (−75 %), marine eutrophication (−65 %), particulate matter formation (−70 %), and ozone depletion (−90 %) over the life cycle; however, there is an increase in environmental impact related to resource utilization (1.2 to 1.5 times) and ecotoxicity (8–9 times). Comparing the two battery alternatives assessed, lithium iron phosphate batteries are preferable both in terms of life cycle environmental impact and cost competitiveness. Extended opportunity charging intervals can reduce environmental impacts further, as they reduce the installed battery capacity, and this also indirectly saves energy due to the reduced ship weight. Carbon abatement cost is around 100€/tCO2eq. A lower interest rate on capital investment in a battery electric ferry brings the carbon abatement cost below zero. This finding indicates that battery electric ferries can be cost-competitive with fossil fuel alternatives with policy support.

Suggested Citation

  • Kanchiralla, Fayas Malik & Grunditz, Emma & Nordelöf, Anders & Brynolf, Selma & Wikner, Evelina, 2025. "Environmental and economic assessment of electric ferries with different lithium-ion battery technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 396(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:396:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925010049
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925010049
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica Kersey & Natalie D. Popovich & Amol A. Phadke, 2022. "Rapid battery cost declines accelerate the prospects of all-electric interregional container shipping," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(7), pages 664-674, July.
    2. Fan, Ailong & Wang, Junteng & He, Yapeng & Perčić, Maja & Vladimir, Nikola & Yang, Liu, 2021. "Decarbonising inland ship power system: Alternative solution and assessment method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    3. Vakili, Seyedvahid & Ölçer, Aykut I., 2023. "Are battery-powered vessels the best solution for the domestic ferry segment? Case study for the domestic ferry segment in the Philippines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    4. Maja Perčić & Nikola Vladimir & Marija Koričan, 2021. "Electrification of Inland Waterway Ships Considering Power System Lifetime Emissions and Costs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Sacchi, R. & Terlouw, T. & Siala, K. & Dirnaichner, A. & Bauer, C. & Cox, B. & Mutel, C. & Daioglou, V. & Luderer, G., 2022. "PRospective EnvironMental Impact asSEment (premise): A streamlined approach to producing databases for prospective life cycle assessment using integrated assessment models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Park, Chybyung & Jeong, Byongug & Zhou, Peilin & Jang, Hayoung & Kim, Seongwan & Jeon, Hyeonmin & Nam, Dong & Rashedi, Ahmad, 2022. "Live-Life cycle assessment of the electric propulsion ship using solar PV," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    7. Perčić, Maja & Frković, Lovro & Pukšec, Tomislav & Ćosić, Boris & Li, Oi Lun & Vladimir, Nikola, 2022. "Life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost assessment of power batteries for all-electric vessels for short-sea navigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    8. Lozano Miralles, José Adolfo & López García, Rafael & Palomar Carnicero, José Manuel & Martínez, Francisco Javier Rey, 2020. "Comparative study of heat pump system and biomass boiler system to a tertiary building using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1439-1450.
    9. Kanchiralla, Fayas Malik & Brynolf, Selma & Olsson, Tobias & Ellis, Joanne & Hansson, Julia & Grahn, Maria, 2023. "How do variations in ship operation impact the techno-economic feasibility and environmental performance of fossil-free fuels? A life cycle study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    10. Park, Chybyung & Jeong, Byongug & Zhou, Peilin, 2022. "Lifecycle energy solution of the electric propulsion ship with Live-Life cycle assessment for clean maritime economy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    11. F. Degen & M. Winter & D. Bendig & J. Tübke, 2023. "Energy consumption of current and future production of lithium-ion and post lithium-ion battery cells," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(11), pages 1284-1295, November.
    12. Perčić, Maja & Ančić, Ivica & Vladimir, Nikola, 2020. "Life-cycle cost assessments of different power system configurations to reduce the carbon footprint in the Croatian short-sea shipping sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frković, Lovro & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Vladimir, Nikola, 2022. "The synergy between the photovoltaic power systems and battery-powered electric ferries in the isolated energy system of an island," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Perčić, Maja & Vladimir, Nikola & Fan, Ailong, 2021. "Techno-economic assessment of alternative marine fuels for inland shipping in Croatia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Perčić, Maja & Frković, Lovro & Pukšec, Tomislav & Ćosić, Boris & Li, Oi Lun & Vladimir, Nikola, 2022. "Life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost assessment of power batteries for all-electric vessels for short-sea navigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    4. Guven, Denizhan, 2025. "Assessing the environmental and economic viability of floating PV-powered green hydrogen: A case study on inland ferry operations in Türkiye," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PD).
    5. Xu, Lijie & Hu, Hui & Ji, Jie & Cai, Jingyong & Dai, Leyang, 2024. "Hybrid energy saving performance of translucent CdTe photovoltaic window on small ship under sailing condition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    6. Desantes, J.M. & Novella, R. & Pla, B. & Lopez-Juarez, M., 2021. "Impact of fuel cell range extender powertrain design on greenhouse gases and NOX emissions in automotive applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    7. Douglas, Christopher M. & Shanbhogue, Santosh & Ghoniem, Ahmed & Zang, Guiyan, 2025. "Well-to-wake cost and emissions assessments for the Western Australia–East Asia green shipping corridor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 384(C).
    8. Konduru, Sudharshan & Naveen, C., 2024. "Intelligent hybrid deep learning models for enhanced shipboard solar irradiance prediction and charging station," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Mohammad Hossein Arabnejad & Fabian Thies & Hua-Dong Yao & Jonas W. Ringsberg, 2025. "Life Cycle Assessment Method for Ship Fuels Using a Ship Performance Prediction Model and Actual Operation Conditions—Case Study of Wind-Assisted Cargo Ship," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-18, August.
    10. Vakili, Seyedvahid & Ölçer, Aykut I., 2023. "Are battery-powered vessels the best solution for the domestic ferry segment? Case study for the domestic ferry segment in the Philippines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    11. He, Yapeng & Yan, Xinping & Fan, Ailong & Yin, Xiaoqing & Meng, Qingjian & Zhang, Lu & Liu, Peijie, 2024. "Assessing the influence of actual LNG emission factors within the EU emissions trading system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 345-358.
    12. Guo, Zixin & Zhao, Wenyang & Ma, Zhichao & Wang, Shenghui & Liu, Jiong & Zhao, Hongwei & Ren, Luquan, 2025. "Slight overdischarge cycling-induced severe degradation of electrochemical and mechanical properties of lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
    13. Cabrera-Jiménez, Richard & Mateo, Josep Maria & Jiménez, Laureano & Pozo, Carlos, 2025. "Prospective life-cycle assessment of sustainable alternatives for road freight transport," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    14. Ahmed, Shoaib & Li, Tie & Yi, Ping & Chen, Run, 2023. "Environmental impact assessment of green ammonia-powered very large tanker ship for decarbonized future shipping operations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    15. Marcin Kolodziejski & Iwona Michalska-Pozoga, 2023. "Battery Energy Storage Systems in Ships’ Hybrid/Electric Propulsion Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, January.
    16. Fozer, Daniel & Owsianiak, Mikołaj & Hauschild, Michael Zwicky, 2025. "Quantifying environmental learning and scaling rates for prospective life cycle assessment of e-ammonia production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    17. Cui, Qi & Li, Xiaofan & Bai, Xiaoxin & He, Ling & Liu, Mengting, 2025. "How the synergy effect between renewable electricity deployment and terminal electrification mitigates transportation sectors' carbon emissions in China?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 135-147.
    18. Lv, Song & Lu, Mengying & Liu, Wenzhuo & Li, Xianglin & Lv, Wenhao & Liu, Zhe & Dong, Xuanchen & Lu, Tonghui & Yang, Bowen, 2025. "Recent advances in longitudinal spatial area marine photovoltaics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    19. Elżbieta Szaruga & Elżbieta Załoga, 2022. "Qualitative–Quantitative Warning Modeling of Energy Consumption Processes in Inland Waterway Freight Transport on River Sections for Environmental Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    20. Li, De-Chang & Yang, Hua-Long, 2024. "Voyage charterparty arrangement for river tramp shipping: Green and traditional vessels comparison," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 75-92.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:396:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925010049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.