IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v387y2025ics0306261925003125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The optimal design for photovoltaic power plants on sites with a general slope

Author

Listed:
  • Barbón, A.
  • Aparicio-Bermejo, J.
  • Bayón, L.
  • Fortuny Ayuso, P.

Abstract

Some of the characteristics of sloping terrain may favour the development of PV power plant projects. However, the deployment of the solar trackers must be optimised in order to avoid significant production losses due to the azimuth angle and the angle of inclination of the terrain. Such optimisation leads to a complex problem, involving 14 variables. The optimal choice of azimuth angle (γ) and tilt angle (α) of a solar tracker for terrain defined by a given azimuth angle (γg) and tilt angle (αg) is by no means trivial. This is the main objective of this paper. Moreover, an optimal PV power plant design requires inter-row spacing that avoid shading between adjacent PV modules in addition to determining the ideal operating periods. Numerical values are presented for 10 locations in the Northern Hemisphere, with terrain azimuth angles between 0(°) and ±45(°), and terrain tilt angles between 0(°) and 15(°). The following main conclusions can be highlighted: (i) The robustness of the derived equations was proven by validating them from three points of view: numerical validation, validation using PVsyst and Mathematica software and experimental validation; (ii) The azimuth angle of the PV system located at high latitudes is strongly affected by the azimuth angle of the terrain. In contrast, at low latitude locations, the azimuth angle of the terrain has very little influence; (iii) The azimuth angle of the PV system, if the latitude of the site is kept constant, is affected by the weather conditions throughout the year; (iv) Regarding energy gain (EG), for PV system site latitudes between 6(°) and 19(°), the optimal deployment does not achieve significantly better results than deploying the PV system in a southerly direction. In contrast, if this comparison is made at locations with latitudes above 19(°), the EG is significant: (a) The higher the latitude, the higher the EG; (b) The higher the γg, the higher the EG; and (c) The higher the αg, the higher the EG. Using Almeria as a baseline for comparison purposes, with αg=5(°), γg=20(°) and EG=240 (Wh/m2), the EG is 390 (Wh/m2) in Helsinki with the same parameters. When γg=30(°) in Almeria, the EG is 530 (Wh/m2). When αg=15(°) in Almeria, the EG is 1030 (Wh/m2). (v) Regarding LCOE efficiency, for latitudes between 6(°) and 19(°), the values obtained are similar to those provided by the southward deployment of solar trackers. For latitudes higher than 19(°) the following hold: (a) The higher the latitude, the higher the LCOE of the optimal deployment. (b) The higher the azimuthal terrain angle, the higher the LCOE, and (c) The higher the terrain tilt angle, the higher the LCOE. Therefore, it can be concluded that the deployment of PV systems at high latitudes is strongly affected by the azimuth angle of the terrain.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbón, A. & Aparicio-Bermejo, J. & Bayón, L. & Fortuny Ayuso, P., 2025. "The optimal design for photovoltaic power plants on sites with a general slope," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 387(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:387:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925003125
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925003125
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Đukan, Mak & Gut, David & Gumber, Anurag & Steffen, Bjarne, 2024. "Harnessing solar power in the Alps: A study on the financial viability of mountain PV systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    2. Barbón, A. & Fortuny Ayuso, P. & Bayón, L. & Fernández-Rubiera, J.A., 2020. "Predicting beam and diffuse horizontal irradiance using Fourier expansions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 46-57.
    3. Dias, Luís & Gouveia, João Pedro & Lourenço, Paulo & Seixas, Júlia, 2019. "Interplay between the potential of photovoltaic systems and agricultural land use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 725-735.
    4. Barbón, A. & Ayuso, P. Fortuny & Bayón, L. & Silva, C.A., 2021. "A comparative study between racking systems for photovoltaic power systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 424-437.
    5. Elkadeem, Mohamed R. & Zainali, Sebastian & Lu, Silvia Ma & Younes, Ali & Abido, Mohamed A. & Amaducci, Stefano & Croci, Michele & Zhang, Jie & Landelius, Tomas & Stridh, Bengt & Campana, Pietro Elia, 2024. "Agrivoltaic systems potentials in Sweden: A geospatial-assisted multi-criteria analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    6. Barbón, A. & Carreira-Fontao, V. & Bayón, L. & Silva, C.A., 2023. "Optimal design and cost analysis of single-axis tracking photovoltaic power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 626-646.
    7. Bahrami, Arian & Okoye, Chiemeka Onyeka & Atikol, Ugur, 2017. "Technical and economic assessment of fixed, single and dual-axis tracking PV panels in low latitude countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 563-579.
    8. Bin Huang & Jialiang Huang & Ke Xing & Lida Liao & Peiling Xie & Meng Xiao & Wei Zhao, 2023. "Development of a Solar-Tracking System for Horizontal Single-Axis PV Arrays Using Spatial Projection Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Makhdoomi, Sina & Askarzadeh, Alireza, 2021. "Impact of solar tracker and energy storage system on sizing of hybrid energy systems: A comparison between diesel/PV/PHS and diesel/PV/FC," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Boubault, Antoine & Ho, Clifford K. & Hall, Aaron & Lambert, Timothy N. & Ambrosini, Andrea, 2016. "Levelized cost of energy (LCOE) metric to characterize solar absorber coatings for the CSP industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 472-483.
    11. Avi Aronescu & Joseph Appelbaum, 2023. "The Effect of Collector Azimuth on Inter-Row Shading in Photovoltaic Fields—A Comprehensive Point of View," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Barbón, A. & Fortuny Ayuso, P. & Bayón, L. & Silva, C.A., 2023. "Experimental and numerical investigation of the influence of terrain slope on the performance of single-axis trackers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    13. Barbón, A. & Bayón-Cueli, C. & Bayón, L. & Carreira-Fontao, V., 2022. "A methodology for an optimal design of ground-mounted photovoltaic power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    14. Conceição, Ricardo & Silva, Hugo G. & Fialho, Luis & Lopes, Francis M. & Collares-Pereira, Manuel, 2019. "PV system design with the effect of soiling on the optimum tilt angle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 787-796.
    15. Zhu, Yongqiang & Liu, Jiahao & Yang, Xiaohua, 2020. "Design and performance analysis of a solar tracking system with a novel single-axis tracking structure to maximize energy collection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    16. Casares de la Torre, F.J. & Varo, Marta & López-Luque, R. & Ramírez-Faz, J. & Fernández-Ahumada, L.M., 2022. "Design and analysis of a tracking / backtracking strategy for PV plants with horizontal trackers after their conversion to agrivoltaic plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 537-550.
    17. Mehleri, E.D. & Zervas, P.L. & Sarimveis, H. & Palyvos, J.A. & Markatos, N.C., 2010. "Determination of the optimal tilt angle and orientation for solar photovoltaic arrays," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 2468-2475.
    18. Branker, K. & Pathak, M.J.M. & Pearce, J.M., 2011. "A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4470-4482.
    19. Arsenio Barbón & Luis Bayón & Guzmán Díaz & Carlos A. Silva, 2022. "Investigation of the Effect of Albedo in Photovoltaic Systems for Urban Applications: Case Study for Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Hao Wang & Guanghui Hu & Junfei Ma & Hong Wei & Sijin Li & Guoan Tang & Liyang Xiong, 2023. "Classifying Slope Unit by Combining Terrain Feature Lines Based on Digital Elevation Models," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    21. Belsky, A.A. & Glukhanich, D.Y. & Carrizosa, M.J. & Starshaia, V.V., 2022. "Analysis of specifications of solar photovoltaic panels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbón, A. & Carreira-Fontao, V. & Bayón, L. & Silva, C.A., 2023. "Optimal design and cost analysis of single-axis tracking photovoltaic power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 626-646.
    2. Barbón, A. & Fortuny Ayuso, P. & Bayón, L. & Silva, C.A., 2023. "Experimental and numerical investigation of the influence of terrain slope on the performance of single-axis trackers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    3. Barbón, A. & Bayón-Cueli, C. & Bayón, L. & Carreira-Fontao, V., 2022. "A methodology for an optimal design of ground-mounted photovoltaic power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    4. Reza Sadeghi & Mattia Parenti & Samuele Memme & Marco Fossa & Stefano Morchio, 2025. "A Review and Comparative Analysis of Solar Tracking Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-48, May.
    5. Barbón, A. & Bayón-Cueli, C. & Bayón, L. & Rodríguez-Suanzes, C., 2022. "Analysis of the tilt and azimuth angles of photovoltaic systems in non-ideal positions for urban applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    6. Barbón, A. & Ayuso, P. Fortuny & Bayón, L. & Silva, C.A., 2021. "A comparative study between racking systems for photovoltaic power systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 424-437.
    7. Ahmed, Eihab E.E. & Demirci, Alpaslan & Tercan, Said Mirza, 2023. "Optimal sizing and techno-enviro-economic feasibility assessment of solar tracker-based hybrid energy systems for rural electrification in Sudan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1057-1070.
    8. Arsenio Barbón & Luis Bayón & Guzmán Díaz & Carlos A. Silva, 2022. "Investigation of the Effect of Albedo in Photovoltaic Systems for Urban Applications: Case Study for Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Arsenio Barbón & Ángel Gutiérrez & Luis Bayón & Covadonga Bayón-Cueli & Javier Aparicio-Bermejo, 2023. "Economic Analysis of a Pumped Hydroelectric Storage-Integrated Floating PV System in the Day-Ahead Iberian Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    10. Rômulo de Oliveira Azevêdo & Paulo Rotela Junior & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha & Gianfranco Chicco & Giancarlo Aquila & Rogério Santana Peruchi, 2020. "Identification and Analysis of Impact Factors on the Economic Feasibility of Photovoltaic Energy Investments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-40, September.
    11. Dinesh, Harshavardhan & Pearce, Joshua M., 2016. "The potential of agrivoltaic systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 299-308.
    12. Cosima Jägemann & Simeon Hagspiel & Dietmar Lindenberger, 2013. "The Economic Inefficiency of Grid Parity: The Case of German Photovoltaics," EWI Working Papers 2013-19, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    13. Zainali, Sebastian & Lu, Silvia Ma & Fernández-Solas, Álvaro & Cruz-Escabias, Alejandro & Fernández, Eduardo F. & Zidane, Tekai Eddine Khalil & Honningdalsnes, Erlend Hustad & Nygård, Magnus Moe & Lel, 2025. "Modelling, simulation, and optimisation of agrivoltaic systems: a comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 386(C).
    14. Oh, Myeongchan & Kim, Jin-Young & Kim, Boyoung & Yun, Chang-Yeol & Kim, Chang Ki & Kang, Yong-Heack & Kim, Hyun-Goo, 2021. "Tolerance angle concept and formula for practical optimal orientation of photovoltaic panels," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 384-394.
    15. Wang, Mingyuan & Zhou, Jinzhi & Ji, Jie & Song, Jian & Ji, Wenhui, 2025. "Performance assessment of solar-driven electrolytic hydrogen production systems enhanced by CdTe PV and sun-tracking device," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
    16. Manoel Henriques de Sá Campos & Chigueru Tiba, 2021. "npTrack: A n-Position Single Axis Solar Tracker Model for Optimized Energy Collection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Rodrigo, Pedro M. & Gutiérrez, Sebastián & Micheli, Leonardo & Fernández, Eduardo F. & Almonacid, Florencia, 2020. "Optimum cleaning schedule of photovoltaic systems based on levelised cost of energy and case study in central Mexico," MPRA Paper 104173, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Hameedullah Zaheb & Habibullah Amiry & Mikaeel Ahmadi & Habibullah Fedayi & Sajida Amiry & Atsushi Yona, 2023. "Maximizing Annual Energy Yield in a Grid-Connected PV Solar Power Plant: Analysis of Seasonal Tilt Angle and Solar Tracking Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Ma, Chao & Deng, Zexing & Xu, Ximeng & Pang, Xiulan & Li, Xiaofeng & Wu, Runze & Tian, Zhuojun, 2024. "Space optimization of utility-scale photovoltaic power plants considering the impact of inter-row shading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    20. Plain, N. & Hingray, B. & Mathy, S., 2019. "Accounting for low solar resource days to size 100% solar microgrids power systems in Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 448-458.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:387:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925003125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.