IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v33y1989i4p297-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional economic growth and the need for power in New England

Author

Listed:
  • Bezdek, Roger H.
  • Sillin, John O.
  • Wendling, Robert M.

Abstract

New England faces a serious shortage of electricity generating power within 5 years, and unless capacity is built in the 1990s the region may suffer large economic losses. Reserve margins may fall below 20% by 1990, and no later than 1992. By the mid-1990s the region could experience a shortfall of 3000-7000 MW. The costs of this shortfall are conservatively estimated to be: - - $20-50 billion (billion--109) in lost economic product (1986 dollars), - - $3-8 billion in lost business profits, - - 400 000-900 000 jobs lost, - - $3-7 billion in state and local government tax revenues lost, - - 2% reduction in regional GNP by the year 2000. Feasible options available to prevent this are imports from Canada and construction of new plant. Conservation can make only a small reduction in slowing electric growth, cogeneration can only prevent the shortfall from getting larger, and various renewable alternatives (solar, wind, wood, waste, etc.) cannot make significant contributions. While opportunities exist in contracting for Canadian hydro-power purchases, there are high economic risks in relying solely on it. Thus, New England utilities and regulators should consider adding new electric capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Bezdek, Roger H. & Sillin, John O. & Wendling, Robert M., 1989. "Regional economic growth and the need for power in New England," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 297-313.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:33:y:1989:i:4:p:297-313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0306-2619(89)90061-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:33:y:1989:i:4:p:297-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.