IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Design and performance of hot-oil storage tanks

Listed author(s):
  • Probert, Douglas
Registered author(s):

    Because the ratio of surface area to capacity decreases with increasing volume for a particular shaped hot-oil storage tank, there is a trend towards larger tanks in order to incur only relatively small heat losses per unit capacity. The present investigation suggests, for conditions encountered in the UK, that the aspect ratio (i.e. height-to-radius) for least heat losses from bare or fully insulated hot-oil tanks should be approximately 0·4. If the cylindrical walls of the tank are to be insulated, the roof remaining bare, then the optimal aspect ratio should be appropriately greater. However, when designing a tank, the running cost is only one of several considerations--although an increasingly important one as fuel costs inflate--the capital investment in the tank and site also radically affect the choice. The economically most favourable aspect ratio, i.e. that leading to the least total financial expenditure over the lifetime of the tank, is considerably in excess of the optimal aspect ratio corresponding to minimum rate of energy loss. This maximum energy thrift or minimum financial expenditure dichotomy is now serious when neither sufficient, cheap fuel nor adequate industrial investment is available.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Applied Energy.

    Volume (Year): 1 (1975)
    Issue (Month): 4 (October)
    Pages: 247-278

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:1:y:1975:i:4:p:247-278
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:1:y:1975:i:4:p:247-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.