IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v414y2022ics0096300321007670.html

Related Thunsdorff type and Frank–Pick type inequalities for Sugeno integral

Author

Listed:
  • Daraby, B.
  • Mesiar, R.
  • Rostampour, F.
  • Rahimi, A.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the Thunsdorff’s inequality for Sugeno integral. By an example, we show that the classical form of this inequality does not hold for Sugeno integral. Then, by reviewing the initial conditions, we prove two main theorems for this inequality. Finally, by checking the special case of the aforementioned Thunsdorff’s inequality, we prove Frank–Pick type inequality for the Sugeno integral and illustrate it by an example.

Suggested Citation

  • Daraby, B. & Mesiar, R. & Rostampour, F. & Rahimi, A., 2022. "Related Thunsdorff type and Frank–Pick type inequalities for Sugeno integral," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 414(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:414:y:2022:i:c:s0096300321007670
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2021.126683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300321007670
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2021.126683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Grabisch, 2016. "Set Functions, Games and Capacities in Decision Making," Theory and Decision Library C, Springer, number 978-3-319-30690-2, December.
    2. Daraby, Bayaz & Ghazanfary Asll, Hassan & Sadeqi, Ildar, 2017. "General related inequalities to Carlson-type inequality for the Sugeno integral," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 305(C), pages 323-329.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michel Grabisch, 2016. "Remarkable polyhedra related to set functions, games and capacities," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(2), pages 301-326, July.
    2. Michel Grabisch & Agnieszka Rusinowska, 2020. "k -additive upper approximation of TU-games," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02860802, HAL.
    3. Ulrich Faigle & Michel Grabisch, 2019. "Least Square Approximations and Linear Values of Cooperative Game," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02381231, HAL.
    4. Takao Asano & Hiroyuki Kojima, 2022. "Choquet Integrals and Belief Functions," KIER Working Papers 1077, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    5. Mustapha Ridaoui & Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2018. "An axiomatisation of the Banzhaf value and interaction index for multichoice games," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02381119, HAL.
    6. Bottero, M. & Ferretti, V. & Figueira, J.R. & Greco, S. & Roy, B., 2018. "On the Choquet multiple criteria preference aggregation model: Theoretical and practical insights from a real-world application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 120-140.
    7. Mayag, Brice & Bouyssou, Denis, 2020. "Necessary and possible interaction between criteria in a 2-additive Choquet integral model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 308-320.
    8. Cinfrignini, Andrea & Petturiti, Davide & Vantaggi, Barbara, 2023. "Dynamic bid–ask pricing under Dempster-Shafer uncertainty," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    9. Ehud Lehrer & Roee Teper, 2020. "Set-valued capacities: multi-agenda decision making," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 69(1), pages 233-248, February.
    10. Michel Grabisch, 2016. "Remarkable polyhedra related to set functions, games," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16081, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    11. Dylan Laplace Mermoud, 2023. "Geometry of Set Functions in Game Theory: Combinatorial and Computational Aspects," Papers 2301.02950, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    12. Khaled Belahcène & Vincent Mousseau & Wassila Ouerdane & Marc Pirlot & Olivier Sobrie, 2023. "Multiple criteria sorting models and methods—Part I: survey of the literature," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-46, March.
    13. Bonifacio Llamazares, 2019. "An Analysis of Winsorized Weighted Means," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 907-933, October.
    14. P. García-Segador & P. Miranda, 2020. "Order cones: a tool for deriving k-dimensional faces of cones of subfamilies of monotone games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 117-137, December.
    15. Larry G Epstein & Kaushil Patel, 2024. "Identifying Heterogeneous Decision Rules From Choices When Menus Are Unobserved," Papers 2405.09500, arXiv.org.
    16. Laura Doval & Ran Eilat, 2023. "The Core of Bayesian Persuasion," Papers 2307.13849, arXiv.org.
    17. Hendrik Rommeswinkel, 2025. "Preference for Verifiability," Papers 2508.19585, arXiv.org.
    18. Alexis Poindron, 2019. "A general model of synchronous updating with binary opinions," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02372486, HAL.
    19. Pierre Bardier, 2025. "The probability of satisfying axioms: a non-binary perspective on economic design," Papers 2502.13850, arXiv.org.
    20. Siskos, Eleftherios & Burgherr, Peter, 2022. "Multicriteria decision support for the evaluation of electricity supply resilience: Exploration of interacting criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 611-626.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:414:y:2022:i:c:s0096300321007670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.