IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v331y2026ics0378377426003318.html

Optimizing irrigation and nitrogen management enhances yield, resource efficiency, and fruit quality in global citrus systems: A meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Weiqi
  • Zhu, Shijiang
  • Qin, Wei
  • Sun, Aihua
  • Li, Hu
  • Hao, Kun
  • Zhong, Yun

Abstract

Inefficient irrigation and excessive nitrogen fertilization undermine citrus productivity, fruit quality, and resource efficiency (Total Water Productivity, TWP; Total Nitrogen Productivity, TNP), while exacerbating environmental risks such as nutrient runoff and eutrophication. Despite extensive research on drip irrigation and integrated water-fertilizer strategies, a global synthesis of water-nitrogen interactions in citrus systems remains elusive due to regional disparities in climate, soil, and farming practices. This study conducts a comprehensive meta-analysis of 1208 experimental observations from 78 peer-reviewed studies across 11 major citrus-countries, which are predominantly characterized by subtropical and Mediterranean-type climates. This study systematically quantifies the effects of optimized water and nitrogen management on citrus yield, fruit quality, TWP, and TNP. At the global scale, citrus production systems exhibit an average yield of 40.4 Mg ha−1, with corresponding TWP and TNP values of 4.0 kg m−3 and 213 kg kg−1, respectively. Key quality parameters exhibited marked regional variation: juice content (20.9—73.5%), total soluble solids (TSS: 6.3—18.7%), maturity index (MI: 1—27), and single fruit weight (17.5—523 g). Optimizing resource inputs significantly enhances crop productivity and quality. Our global dataset analysis revealed that optimizing water input increased yield by 1.7% and TWP by 33.6%. More importantly, reducing nitrogen applications from common excessive levels to an optimal rate boosted yield and TNP by 12%. Both strategies concurrently improved fruit quality. Analysis of the global dataset suggests that mean input levels of 937 mm water and 163 kg ha−1 nitrogen are associated with relatively high productivity and resource use efficiency in the pooled dataset, indicating a balance between maintaining yield and avoiding excessive input use. While these values should not be interpreted as prescriptive recommendations, they provide a useful reference for evaluating current management practices. At these approximate levels, projections indicate potential for 12% water savings (153 mm) and 19% nitrogen reduction (46 kg ha−1) relative to prevailing inputs. Notably, regions such as Pakistan (16% water savings) and the U.S. (10% nitrogen savings) illustrate how resource-saving opportunities vary across contexts. These findings highlight broad patterns that can inform region-specific precision management, rather than universal thresholds. By aligning management practices with crop requirements, this study advances the dual goals of sustainable citrus production—enhancing economic returns through improved yield/quality while mitigating environmental footprints through resource conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Weiqi & Zhu, Shijiang & Qin, Wei & Sun, Aihua & Li, Hu & Hao, Kun & Zhong, Yun, 2026. "Optimizing irrigation and nitrogen management enhances yield, resource efficiency, and fruit quality in global citrus systems: A meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:331:y:2026:i:c:s0378377426003318
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377426003318
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:331:y:2026:i:c:s0378377426003318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.