IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v331y2026ics0378377426003264.html

Reducing uncertainty of evapotranspiration products across China under extreme climatic conditions using flux-tower observations and machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Qian, Long
  • Wu, Lifeng
  • Lyu, Jifa
  • Yu, Xingjiao
  • Cui, Yaokui
  • Yang, Xiaofei
  • Liu, Yanfu
  • Li, Zilong
  • Liu, Xiaogang
  • Bian, Jiang
  • Chen, Junying
  • Zhang, Zhitao

Abstract

Accurate estimation of terrestrial evapotranspiration (ET) is critical for understanding land–atmosphere interactions and supporting sustainable water resource management under climate change. However, large uncertainties persist in China due to complex surface heterogeneity, sparse ground observations, and frequent extreme events. This study presents the first comprehensive evaluation of evapotranspiration products over China using observations from 64 eddy covariance flux towers, assessing multiple daily and monthly datasets across diverse climate zones, land surface types, and five representative extreme climatic conditions, including high temperature (Temp), high vapor pressure deficit (VPD), high precipitation (Pre), high wind speed (WS), and drought. An explainable machine learning framework based on XGBoost was further developed to reduce ET uncertainties and identify dominant controlling factors, with independent validation conducted using additional flux sites. The results show that: 1) Under overall conditions, daily ET products exhibit larger uncertainties than monthly products, with correlation coefficients (r) generally ranging from 0.37 to 0.59 for daily estimates and from 0.61 to 0.85 for monthly estimates. Under extreme climatic conditions, daily ET accuracy declines sharply, with the mean correlation decreasing from 0.634 to 0.332, showing the strongest degradation under high VPD and relatively weaker sensitivity under high WS. Monthly ET products are less affected by extremes but still show notable performance deterioration during drought conditions. 2) In typical dense flux observations regions, none of the ET products capture spatial heterogeneity effectively, and estimation accuracy declines noticeably. 3) The XGBoost model significantly enhances ET estimation at both daily (r = 0.908) and monthly (r = 0.931) scales, particularly under extreme climatic conditions. ET products, solar radiation (Rs), and VPD are the primary contributors associated with higher estimated ET in the model. Independent validation across 12 sites confirmed robustness of XGBoost, demonstrating strong performance even under extreme climatic conditions. Overall, this study recommends integrating flux-tower-informed machine-learning fusion with existing ET products as an effective pathway to reduce ET uncertainty and enhance the reliability of regional water-cycle assessments and climate-impact analyses in complex climatic regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian, Long & Wu, Lifeng & Lyu, Jifa & Yu, Xingjiao & Cui, Yaokui & Yang, Xiaofei & Liu, Yanfu & Li, Zilong & Liu, Xiaogang & Bian, Jiang & Chen, Junying & Zhang, Zhitao, 2026. "Reducing uncertainty of evapotranspiration products across China under extreme climatic conditions using flux-tower observations and machine learning," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:331:y:2026:i:c:s0378377426003264
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377426003264
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:331:y:2026:i:c:s0378377426003264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.