IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v328y2026ics0378377426001885.html

Stage-dependent response of maize grain formation to shading, waterlogging, and their combination: Insights from floret differentiation and floret setting

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Qinghao
  • Yu, Ningning
  • Liu, Peng
  • Zhao, Bin
  • Zhang, Jiwang
  • Ren, Baizhao

Abstract

Climate change has been demonstrated to increase the frequency of complex abiotic stresses in the future, of which the combination of shading and waterlogging caused by persistent rainfall is an important limiting factor affecting maize grain formation and yield. We investigate grain loss in summer maize induced by shading, waterlogging, and their combined stresses at different stages, and how these stresses affect floret differentiation and floret setting. Maize hybrid Denghai 605 (DH605) was chosen as the test material, with three stress treatments: shading (S), waterlogging (W), and their combined stress (SW) for 6 days at the sixth leaf stage (V6) and tasseling stage (VT). Net photosynthetic rate, plant growth rate, floret differentiation, fertilization characteristics, and ovary development were investigated. Results showed that shading, waterlogging, and their combined stress during the V6 stage significantly reduced photosynthetic capacity and leaf growth, delayed the ear elongation and led to a decrease in total floret number. Additionally, the decreased floret setting rate during the reproductive growth stage further exacerbated grain loss. Pollen viability and silking rate were more sensitive to shading, waterlogging and the combined stresses imposed at VT than at V6, reducing floret fertilization rate. Additionally, the reduction in starch content in the ovary increased the risk of post-fertilization abortion by an average of 40.6%-67.1%, representing the highest proportion among the other two causes of kernel loss (loss from silking and fertilization) analyzed. Waterlogging at V6 stage was the dominant factor affecting summer maize yield (whereas at VT was shading), and combined stresses showed greater losses compared to single stresses. The yield of V6-SW and VT-SW was decreased by 11.3% and 2.9%, respectively, compared to the S treatment in the same period; and by 2.0% and 12.6%, respectively, compared to the W treatment in the same period. These findings provide new insights into the responses of maize grain formation to shading, waterlogging, and their combination at different growth stages, and highlight that reducing post-fertilization ovary abortion is an important research objective for mitigating yield losses in maize under persistent rainy conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Qinghao & Yu, Ningning & Liu, Peng & Zhao, Bin & Zhang, Jiwang & Ren, Baizhao, 2026. "Stage-dependent response of maize grain formation to shading, waterlogging, and their combination: Insights from floret differentiation and floret setting," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:328:y:2026:i:c:s0378377426001885
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377426001885
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2026.110307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:328:y:2026:i:c:s0378377426001885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.