IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v319y2025ics0378377425004925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which factors and how they determine nitrogen runoff loss in rice agroecosystems across China

Author

Listed:
  • Qi, Junjia
  • Wang, Yi
  • Zhao, Ying
  • Lv, Zhenghui
  • Kan, Shengjie
  • Lv, Yuchen
  • Li, Yong

Abstract

Clarifying the characteristics and mechanisms of nitrogen (N) runoff loss in rice cropping systems is crucial for optimizing agricultural N management strategies and controlling non-point source pollution in China. However, the key factors and how they determine N runoff loss in rice cropping systems, remain unclear at a national scale. This study collected 560 data sets from 86 published papers, using the Random Forest Ranking and Piecewise Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to determine key factors and their linkage to N runoff loss in the Chinese rice cropping systems. The results showed that the average N runoff loss was 9.52 kg N ha−1 season−1 in the Chinese rice cropping systems, and the average N runoff loss was significantly higher in the paddy rice system (PRS) compared to the paddy rice-upland rotation system (PRURS) (10.40 vs. 8.60 kg N ha−1 season−1). The Random Forest Ranking determined that precipitation, N fertilization rate, and total soil N (TSN) were identified as key influencing factors for N runoff loss, while soil elemental stoichiometric ratios (e.g., C:N:P) were negatively correlated with N runoff loss, and the later factors highlighted the importance of paddy soil biogeochemical cycling in regulating N runoff loss in the Chinese rice cropping systems. Soil C:N:P and soil nutrient properties were more influential in the PRS, whereas N fertilization rate and precipitation were more critical in the PRURS. The Piecewise SEM suggested that the pathway effects of the composite variables of fertilization rate, soil nutrient properties, and soil C:N:P on N runoff loss were ranked as follows: Fertilization (0.52) > Soil nutrient properties (0.29) > Soil C:N:P (-0.14), in the Chinese rice cropping systems. The pathway effects of the three composite variables were ranked as Fertilization (0.52) > Soil nutrient properties (0.38) > Soil C:N:P ratio (−0.19) in the PRS, and Fertilization (0.52) > Soil nutrient properties (0.13) > Soil C:N:P ratio (−0.10) in the PRURS. This indicate that soil nutrient properties and the soil C:N:P ratio exert stronger effects on N runoff loss in the PRS than in the PRURS. These results provide deeper insights for mitigating N runoff loss and improving N use efficiency, and they highlight the critical role of soil elemental stoichiometry in regulating N migration and transformation within paddy water in rice cropping systems in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi, Junjia & Wang, Yi & Zhao, Ying & Lv, Zhenghui & Kan, Shengjie & Lv, Yuchen & Li, Yong, 2025. "Which factors and how they determine nitrogen runoff loss in rice agroecosystems across China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:319:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425004925
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425004925
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:319:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425004925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.