IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v317y2025ics0378377425003580.html

Crop rotation enhances yield and water productivity: Uncovering potential drivers through global field experiment synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Liangang
  • Wang, Yudi
  • Zhang, Chenxi
  • Zhao, Kebing
  • Zhao, Rongqin
  • Xie, Zhixiang

Abstract

Crop yield, crop water productivity (WPc), and crop evapotranspiration (ETc) represent three essential ecological metrics for evaluating sustainable intensification strategies in cropland management. However, integrated analyses of crop rotation’s effects on these parameters remain underexplored, obscuring mechanistic understanding of how rotation practices drive productivity gains through optimized water use. Based on 1217 pairs of field experimental data across global croplands, we systematically quantified rotation-induced modifications in yield-water dynamics of five major food crops and identified the key environmental and agronomic drivers. Key findings demonstrated significant rotation-driven enhancements in yield (+13.2 %) and WPc (+17.6 %), coupled with reduced ETc (-6.2 %). Higher improvement of crop yield and WPc was observed for potato as compared to wheat, maize, soybean and rice, while multi-crop sequences outperformed simple rotations. A complete duration of rotation cycle of ≥ 2 year seemed more suitable for maintaining higher benefits in yield and WPc. Crop rotation performed better in soils with pH < 6.5 and regions with MAP < 500 mm. Although irrigation regimes showed negligible influence, nitrogen inputs exhibited strict thresholds (< 120 kg ha⁻¹) for maximizing yield and WPc increase. Notably, rotational advantages were confined to conventional tillage systems, demonstrating limited synergy with no-till/residue retention practices. The observed ETc reduction revealed water-saving mechanisms through preferential transpiration enhancement over evaporation suppression. This study illustrates crop rotation as a dual-function strategy that concurrently addresses yield enhancement and water conservation, which positions crop rotation as indispensable components of conservation agriculture. The findings may provide valuable insights for enhancing crop rotation strategies through species-specific chronological arrangements, environmental compatibility assessments, and precision agricultural practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Liangang & Wang, Yudi & Zhang, Chenxi & Zhao, Kebing & Zhao, Rongqin & Xie, Zhixiang, 2025. "Crop rotation enhances yield and water productivity: Uncovering potential drivers through global field experiment synthesis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425003580
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425003580
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109644?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiao, Liangang & Lin, Yi & Chen, Deliang & Zhao, Kebing & Wang, Yudi & You, Zengtao & Zhao, Rongqin & Xie, Zhixiang & Liu, Junguo, 2024. "Maximizing crop yield and water productivity through biochar application: A global synthesis of field experiments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    2. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Wang, Shulan & Wang, Hao & Zhang, Yuanhong & Wang, Rui & Zhang, Yujiao & Xu, Zonggui & Jia, Guangcan & Wang, Xiaoli & Li, Jun, 2018. "The influence of rotational tillage on soil water storage, water use efficiency and maize yield in semi-arid areas under varied rainfall conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 376-384.
    4. Xiao, Liangang & Wei, Xi & Wang, Chunying & Zhao, Rongqin, 2023. "Plastic film mulching significantly boosts crop production and water use efficiency but not evapotranspiration in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    5. R.W. Neugschwandtner & P. Liebhard & H.-P. Kaul & H. Wagentristl, 2014. "Soil chemical properties as affected by tillage and crop rotation in a long-term field experiment," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(2), pages 57-62.
    6. Sainju, Upendra M. & Lenssen, Andrew W. & Allen, Brett L. & Jabro, Jalal D. & Stevens, William B., 2021. "Crop water and nitrogen productivity in response to long-term diversified crop rotations and management systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    7. Mangi Lal Jat & Debashis Chakraborty & Jagdish Kumar Ladha & Dharamvir Singh Rana & Mahesh Kumar Gathala & Andrew McDonald & Bruno Gerard, 2020. "Conservation agriculture for sustainable intensification in South Asia," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(4), pages 336-343, April.
    8. David Weisberger & Virginia Nichols & Matt Liebman, 2019. "Does diversifying crop rotations suppress weeds? A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, July.
    9. R. Lal, 2009. "Soil degradation as a reason for inadequate human nutrition," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 1(1), pages 45-57, February.
    10. Knowler, Duncan & Bradshaw, Ben, 2007. "Farmers' adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 25-48, February.
    11. David S. Powlson & Clare M. Stirling & M. L. Jat & Bruno G. Gerard & Cheryl A. Palm & Pedro A. Sanchez & Kenneth G. Cassman, 2014. "Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(8), pages 678-683, August.
    12. Cameron M. Pittelkow & Xinqiang Liang & Bruce A. Linquist & Kees Jan van Groenigen & Juhwan Lee & Mark E. Lundy & Natasja van Gestel & Johan Six & Rodney T. Venterea & Chris van Kessel, 2015. "Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 517(7534), pages 365-368, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Calzarano & Fabio Stagnari & Sara D’Egidio & Giancarlo Pagnani & Angelica Galieni & Stefano Di Marco & Elisa Giorgia Metruccio & Michele Pisante, 2018. "Durum Wheat Quality, Yield and Sanitary Status under Conservation Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Perego, A. & Rocca, A. & Cattivelli, V. & Tabaglio, V. & Fiorini, A. & Barbieri, S. & Schillaci, C. & Chiodini, M.E. & Brenna, S. & Acutis, M., 2019. "Agro-environmental aspects of conservation agriculture compared to conventional systems: A 3-year experience on 20 farms in the Po valley (Northern Italy)," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 73-87.
    3. Jialing Teng & Ruixing Hou & Jennifer A. J. Dungait & Guiyao Zhou & Yakov Kuzyakov & Jingbo Zhang & Jing Tian & Zhenling Cui & Fusuo Zhang & Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo, 2024. "Conservation agriculture improves soil health and sustains crop yields after long-term warming," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Bhim Bahadur Ghaley & Teodor Rusu & Taru Sandén & Heide Spiegel & Cristina Menta & Giovanna Visioli & Lilian O’Sullivan & Isabelle Trinsoutrot Gattin & Antonio Delgado & Mark A. Liebig & Dirk Vrebos &, 2018. "Assessment of Benefits of Conservation Agriculture on Soil Functions in Arable Production Systems in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Rattan Lal, 2015. "Restoring Soil Quality to Mitigate Soil Degradation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Anantha, K.H. & Garg, Kaushal K. & Barron, Jennie & Dixit, Sreenath & Venkataradha, A. & Singh, Ramesh & Whitbread, Anthony M., 2021. "Impact of best management practices on sustainable crop production and climate resilience in smallholder farming systems of South Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    7. Wondimagegn Tesfaye & Garrick Blalock & Nyasha Tirivayi, 2021. "Climate‐Smart Innovations and Rural Poverty in Ethiopia: Exploring Impacts and Pathways," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 878-899, May.
    8. Lalani, Baqir & Aminpour, Payam & Gray, Steven & Williams, Meredith & Büchi, Lucie & Haggar, Jeremy & Grabowski, Philip & Dambiro, José, 2021. "Mapping farmer perceptions, Conservation Agriculture practices and on-farm measurements: The role of systems thinking in the process of adoption," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Tambo, J. & Mockshell, J., 2018. "Differential impacts of conservation agriculture technology options on household welfare in sub-Saharan Africa," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277035, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Adam M. Komarek, 2018. "Conservation agriculture in western China increases productivity and profits without decreasing resilience," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(5), pages 1251-1262, October.
    11. Somasundaram Jayaraman & Yash P. Dang & Anandkumar Naorem & Kathryn L. Page & Ram C. Dalal, 2021. "Conservation Agriculture as a System to Enhance Ecosystem Services," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Parihar, C.M. & Meena, B.R. & Nayak, Hari Sankar & Patra, K. & Sena, D.R. & Singh, Raj & Jat, S.L. & Sharma, D.K. & Mahala, D.M. & Patra, S. & Rupesh, & Rathi, N. & Choudhary, M. & Jat, M.L. & Abdalla, 2022. "Co-implementation of precision nutrient management in long-term conservation agriculture-based systems: A step towards sustainable energy-water-food nexus," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    13. Makate, Clifton & Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamine, 2025. "Conservation Agriculture and sustainability of smallholder farms in Zimbabwe: Insights from a nationwide survey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Liangang Xiao & Minglei Ding & Chong Wei & Ruiming Zhu & Rongqin Zhao, 2020. "The Impacts of Conservation Agriculture on Water Use and Crop Production on the Loess Plateau: From Know-What to Know-Why," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Christian Thierfelder & Pauline Chivenge & Walter Mupangwa & Todd S. Rosenstock & Christine Lamanna & Joseph X. Eyre, 2017. "How climate-smart is conservation agriculture (CA)? – its potential to deliver on adaptation, mitigation and productivity on smallholder farms in southern Africa," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(3), pages 537-560, June.
    16. Akter, Shaheen & Gathala, Mahesh K. & Timsina, Jagadish & Islam, Saiful & Rahman, Mahbubur & Hassan, Mustafa Kamrul & Ghosh, Anup Kumar, 2021. "Adoption of conservation agriculture-based tillage practices in the rice-maize systems in Bangladesh," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    17. Ruiz-Espinosa, Laura I. & Verhulst, Nele & van Ogtrop, Floris & Cross, Rebecca & Govaerts, Bram & van Rees, Harm & Trethowan, Richard, 2024. "Quantifying the adoption of conservation agriculture: Development and application of the Conservation Agriculture Appraisal Index," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    18. Ward, Patrick S. & Mapemba, Lawrence & Bell, Andrew R., 2021. "Smart subsidies for sustainable soils: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in southern Malawi," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    19. Tambo, Justice A. & Mockshell, Jonathan, 2018. "Differential Impacts of Conservation Agriculture Technology Options on Household Income in Sub-Saharan Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 95-105.
    20. Kirui, Oliver & Tambo, Justice, 2021. "Yield Effects of Conservation Agriculture Under Fall Armyworm Stress: The Case of Zambia," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315882, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:317:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425003580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.