IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v316y2025ics0378377425003063.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the use of remotely sensed surface water flux to estimate net groundwater storage change in an aquifer predominantly used for irrigation

Author

Listed:
  • Viviers, Cindy
  • van der Laan, Michael

Abstract

In intensely irrigated regions, effective cultivation and water use monitoring is crucial to ensure sustainability. Using the Steenkoppies Dolomitic Compartment (South Africa) as a case study, this study proposed a novel approach to monitor active cultivation, crop and net irrigation water use, and net groundwater storage (GWS) changes. The method addresses the limitations of annual land use land cover datasets and reliance on local ground-based data, enabling higher spatio-temporal Earth observation monitoring for intensively irrigated, groundwater-dependent areas. Remotely sensed data can estimate actual evapotranspiration (ETa) across various land cover types, but application for crop and irrigation water use monitoring specifically, requires integration with datasets identifying actively cultivated areas. A Random Forest classifier, trained on seasonal Sentinel-2 composites to capture crop phenological changes, was used to identify cultivated areas in monthly composites. These cultivated areas were integrated with WaPOR (Water Productivity Open Access Portal) ETa data to estimate monthly crop water use, while the difference between ETa and precipitation provided estimates of monthly surface water flux and net irrigation water use. Comparing surface water flux with net GWS changes offered a holistic, near real-time view of water demand and aquifer status at a monthly temporal resolution and a spatial resolution of 250 m. The study concluded that the irrigated cropped area expanded by 14 % since 2012, reaching 6 065 ha in 2021. The WaPOR-based crop water use estimates concluded a 250–300 mm shortfall compared to crop model estimates. The deficits between mean annual precipitation (652–733 mm yr−1) and the WaPOR-based mean annual irrigated crop water use (1 090 mm yr−1) over 6 065 ha equate to 21.7 Mm³ yr−1 and 26.6 Mm³ yr−1, aligning with the literature groundwater abstraction estimates exceeding 20 Mm³ for irrigation. Using the pixel-based, sum of monthly net irrigation estimates, however, even when factoring in a precipitation efficiency of 70 % and an irrigation efficiency of 80 %, the WaPOR-based net irrigation water use was estimated at only 12.7 Mm³ yr−1 for 2018/19 and 9.3 Mm³ yr−1 for 2019/20. The comparison of surface water flux with net GWS and precipitation confirmed that irrigated cultivation is the primary groundwater user, and that groundwater abstraction peaks during low precipitation periods, with precipitation being the main aquifer recharge source. Surface water flux proved a reliable proxy for monitoring and predicting the impact of irrigation on GWS levels during dry seasons. The cultivation and net irrigation intensity maps can be essential for strategising regulatory efforts and monitoring compliance with groundwater mitigation measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Viviers, Cindy & van der Laan, Michael, 2025. "Assessing the use of remotely sensed surface water flux to estimate net groundwater storage change in an aquifer predominantly used for irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:316:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425003063
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425003063
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109592?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:316:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425003063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.