IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v284y2023ics0378377423002196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of soil salinity on foxtail millet osmoregulation, grain yield, and soil water utilization under varying water conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Yuzhao
  • Liu, Wenwen
  • Qiao, Yunzhou
  • Qiao, Wenjun
  • Yang, Hong
  • Zhong, Yuanning
  • Yang, Han
  • Wang, Huili
  • Li, Yongpeng
  • Dong, Baodi
  • Liu, Mengyu

Abstract

Salinity and water deficit are major abiotic environmental stresses affecting crop quality in arid and semi-arid areas. Particularly, salinity stress induces several detrimental physiological effects on crops, including toxic ion accumulation, disturbed osmotic potential, and reduced grain yield. However, how salinity stress reduces growth loss and maintains water productivity (WP) by compensating for water conditions in foxtail millet remains unclear. Herein, a two-year experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of two soil water levels [W1, 45% ± 5% field capacity (FC); and W2, 75% ± 5% FC; FC, 0.34 cm3 cm−3] and ten soil salinity levels (S, 1.0–2.8 g kg−1 in 0.2 g kg−1 intervals) on foxtail millet flag-leaf osmoregulation, grain yield, and soil water utilization in the Bohai Lowland of the North China Plain. The results indicated that the plant survival rate was significantly lower at W2 than at W1 three days after sowing. Compared with W1, the Na+ (2.94–9.96% for S1.8 and S2.0) and proline contents (2.74–61.48%) at W2 were lower from the heading to the grain filling stage, whereas the K+ content (5.39–23.24% from S1.6 to S2.0, except for S1.6 at the flowering stage) was significantly higher. With increasing salt stress, the leaf water potential dropped continuously. Compared with S1.0, evapotranspiration at S1.6, S2.2, and S2.8 decreased significantly by 8.36–72.70% at W1 (except for S1.6) and by 4.69–52.44% at W2 in both study years. In 2021, aboveground biomass decreased at W1, but remained stable at W2 in S1.0–S1.4, at the mature stage. Compared with W1, W2 increased the grain yield (1.54–110.85%) but decreased water productivity at the grain yield (WPy, 1.54–33.72%) and biomass levels (WPbm, 2.36–47.49%). Overall, the grain yield at the soil salinity levels of 1.87 and 1.91 g kg−1 (at W1 and W2, respectively) was only half that at 1.0 g kg−1 soil salinity. Altogether, this study provides guidelines for foxtail millet cultivation in saline soils.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Yuzhao & Liu, Wenwen & Qiao, Yunzhou & Qiao, Wenjun & Yang, Hong & Zhong, Yuanning & Yang, Han & Wang, Huili & Li, Yongpeng & Dong, Baodi & Liu, Mengyu, 2023. "Effects of soil salinity on foxtail millet osmoregulation, grain yield, and soil water utilization under varying water conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:284:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423002196
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423002196
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:284:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423002196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.