IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v284y2023ics0378377423002111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the application of artificial hot and cold reference surfaces for improved ETc estimation using the UAS-METRIC energy balance model

Author

Listed:
  • Molaei, Behnaz
  • Chandel, Abhilash K.
  • Peters, R. Troy
  • Khot, Lav R.
  • Khan, Azeem
  • Maureira, Fidel
  • Stockle, Claudio

Abstract

The METRIC energy balance model requires the temperature of a hot (dry bare agricultural soil) and cold (fully transpiring crop) surfaces for the internal calibration and estimation of crop evapotranspiration (ETc). A previous study indicated that because of the limited field-of-view of UAS-based imagery, the application of unmanned aerial systems (UAS)-based METRIC could not guarantee the availability of representative hot and cold pixels in the field-of-view of the flight mission, even if the pixels were manually chosen. A study was conducted for two years (2017 and 2018) to evaluate the suitability of various artificial and portable hot (dry red mulch, dry terra cotta saucer plate, coconut fiber, wheat straw) and cold (surface of water, wet terra cotta saucer plate, green sponge, and white granite tile on top of polystyrene foam floating on water) artificial surfaces for use in the calibration of the UAS-METRIC model. The temperature of the surfaces was measured with a thermal infrared sensor mounted on a ground vehicle with a retractable mast (up to 7-m) facing downward to capture images at around the nadir hours (11 AM to 3 PM). The results showed that a green sponge floating in a water tray and a dry terra cotta saucer plate full of water best matched (rwet sponge= 0.93, rwet saucer =0.86) the temperature dynamics of fully irrigated short grass. Dry red mulch and a dry terra cotta saucer plate best matched (rdry red mulch= 0.98, rdry saucer =0.97) the temperature dynamics of bare and dry agricultural soil. These artificial hot and cold reference surfaces were then located within a field of view of nine different UAS flight missions over a spearmint field during the summer of 2021. Although the temperatures of the cold artificial surfaces correlated well with fully irrigated short grass planted near the spearmint field, they were 1.9–8.3 °C warmer than the taller spearmint crop canopy. The temperature of a dry red mulch/wet sponge and dry/wet terra cotta saucer plate used as artificial hot/cold anchor temperatures for ET estimation by the UAS-METRIC model resulted in overestimating the ETc obtained using field hot/cold pixels (dry bare soil/fully irrigated spearmint), or the ETc estimation based on a soil water balance measured by neutron probe and TEROS-10 sensors. The best hot/cold temperatures for internal calibration of the UAS-based imagery ET model are from dry soil and a fully irrigated canopy located in the field of view. In the absence of dry bare soil within the image, the use of dry red mulch is suggested. Additional research is needed to find artificial cold surfaces with temperatures closer to the temperature of fully irrigated canopies, which can be conveniently located for auto-selection within the images. In the meantime, for farm-scale applications, maintaining a field section guaranteed to be well irrigated is recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Molaei, Behnaz & Chandel, Abhilash K. & Peters, R. Troy & Khot, Lav R. & Khan, Azeem & Maureira, Fidel & Stockle, Claudio, 2023. "Investigating the application of artificial hot and cold reference surfaces for improved ETc estimation using the UAS-METRIC energy balance model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:284:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423002111
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423002111
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:284:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423002111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.