IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v284y2023ics0378377423002032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of surface and subsurface drip fertigated wheat-moongbean-maize cropping system under different irrigation schedules and nutrient doses

Author

Listed:
  • Dhayal, Diana
  • Lal, Khajanchi
  • Khanna, Manoj
  • Sudhishri, Susama
  • Brar, A.S.
  • Sindhu, Vinay Kumar
  • Singh, Man
  • Bhattacharyya, R.
  • Rajath, E.
  • Rosin, K.G.
  • Chakraborty, D.

Abstract

The prevalence of water-intensive cropping systems in tandem with the use of traditional irrigation methods such as flood irrigation have resulted in alarming water scarcity levels in many countries like India. Enhancing irrigation and nutrient use efficiency in agriculture using drip irrigation systems is accentuated to address the rising water scarcity and fertilizer crisis. Input use efficiencies may be further improved by optimizing nutrient doses and irrigation schedules. In the present study, crop and water productivities of wheat-moongbean-maize cropping system, were evaluated for surface drip irrigation (SDI) and subsurface drip irrigation (SSDI) systems when irrigated at 0.6 and 0.8 ETC (crop evapotranspiration) and fertigated with 0, 60, 80 and 100 % recommended doses of Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P) and Potassium (K) fertilizers (RDF). The results were compared with the conventional local practice of surface flood irrigation and soil application of recommended fertilizers. SSDI at 0.8 ETc with 100 % fertigation of RDF in the ‘wheat-moongbean-maize’ cropping system increased average system productivity by 5.4 %, irrigation water productivity by 118 % and total water productivity by 45 % compared to surface flood irrigation and soil application of fertilizers. The total amount of irrigation water applied through SDI or SSDI at 0.8 ETc (336–274 mm) was 44.0 % and 58.5 % lower compared to surface flood (600–660 mm) in 2019–20 and 2020–21 seasons, respectively. Fertigation using SDI or SSDI also reduced fertilizer requirements for this cropping system by 20 % to obtain an equivalent yield to the conventional system. Fertigation of 60 %, 80 % and 100 % RDF resulted in significant yield gain of 36 %, 55 % and 67 % in wheat; 25 %, 31 % and 34 % in moongbean and 33 %, 49 % and 62 % in maize as compared to fertilizer control (0 % RDF), respectively. On average, grain yields obtained with irrigation scheduling at 0.8 ETC were circa 10 % higher than that at 0.6 ETC.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhayal, Diana & Lal, Khajanchi & Khanna, Manoj & Sudhishri, Susama & Brar, A.S. & Sindhu, Vinay Kumar & Singh, Man & Bhattacharyya, R. & Rajath, E. & Rosin, K.G. & Chakraborty, D., 2023. "Performance of surface and subsurface drip fertigated wheat-moongbean-maize cropping system under different irrigation schedules and nutrient doses," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:284:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423002032
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423002032
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yamini, Vaddula & Singh, Kulvir, 2024. "Emitter spacing, depth of lateral placement, and nutrient levels affect productivity of cotton-wheat cropping system under sub-surface drip fertigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:284:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423002032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.