Maximum likelihood estimates for the Hildreth-Houck random coefficients model
We explore maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of the Hildreth-Houck random coefficients model. We show that the global ML estimator can be inconsistent. We develop an alternative LML (local ML) estimator and prove that it is consistent and asymptotically efficient for points in the interior of the parameters. Properties of the LML and comparisons with common method of moments (MM) estimates are done via Monte Carlo. Boundary parameters lead to nonstandard asymptotic distributions for the LML which are described. The LML is used to develop a modification of the LR test for random coefficients. Simulations suggest that the LR test is more powerful for distant alternatives than the Breusch-Pagan (BP) Lagrange multiplier test. A simple modification of the BP test also appears to be more powerful than the BP. Copyright Royal Economic Society 2002
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 5 (2002)
Issue (Month): 1 (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Office of the Secretary-General, Rm E35, The Bute Building, Westburn Lane, St Andrews, KY16 9TS, UK|
Phone: +44 1334 462479
Web page: http://www.res.org.uk/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.ectj.org|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ect:emjrnl:v:5:y:2002:i:1:p:237-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)or (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.