IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ect/emjrnl/v12y2009i2p232-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On skewness and kurtosis of econometric estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Bao
  • Aman Ullah

Abstract

We derive the approximate results for two standardized measures of deviation from normality, namely, the skewness and excess kurtosis coefficients, for a class of econometric estimators. The results are built on a stochastic expansion of the moment condition used to identify the econometric estimator. The approximate results can be used not only to study the finite sample behaviour of a particular estimator, but also to compare the finite sample properties of two asymptotically equivalent estimators. We apply the approximate results to the spatial autoregressive model and find that our results approximate the non-normal behaviours of the maximum likelihood estimator reasonably well. However, when the weights matrix becomes denser, the finite sample distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator departs more severely from normality and our results provide less accurate approximation. Copyright © 2009 The Author(s). Journal compilation © Royal Economic Society 2009

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Bao & Aman Ullah, 2009. "On skewness and kurtosis of econometric estimators," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 12(2), pages 232-247, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ect:emjrnl:v:12:y:2009:i:2:p:232-247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2009.00289.x
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Xiaohu & Phillips, Peter C.B. & Yu, Jun, 2011. "Bias in estimating multivariate and univariate diffusions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 161(2), pages 228-245, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ect:emjrnl:v:12:y:2009:i:2:p:232-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.