IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-25-00245.html

High-quality financial statements, credit constraints, and labor productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Dorgyles C.M. Kouakou

    (Université de Rennes, CNRS, CREM - UMR 6211, F-35000 Rennes, France)

Abstract

Using a large firm-level dataset from the World Bank Enterprise Surveys covering the period 2006-2024, which includes 146 countries and over 158,900 observations, this paper employs an instrumental variable strategy to show that firms with high-quality financial statements (HQFS)—defined as financial statements checked and certified by an external auditor—exhibit significantly higher labor productivity, approximately 46% higher. This result is robust across various tests. A decline in credit constraints is highlighted as the key channel through which HQFS increases labor productivity. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the effect of HQFS diminishes with increasing firm size and age, as well as with higher levels of structural factors, including real GDP per capita, domestic credit to the private sector, and control of corruption. This indicates that the effect of HQFS on labor productivity is primarily observed among small, young firms in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorgyles C.M. Kouakou, 2025. "High-quality financial statements, credit constraints, and labor productivity," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 45(4), pages 1885-1897.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-25-00245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2025/Volume45/EB-25-V45-I4-P164.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-25-00245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.