IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-03h20002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditing ghosts by prosperity signals

Author

Listed:
  • Gideon Yaniv

    (College of Management & National Insurance Institute, Israel)

Abstract

Ghosts are economic agents who evade taxes by failing to file a return. Knowing nothing about them, the tax agency is unable to track them down through audit strategies which are based on reported income. The present paper develops a simple model of the audit decision for a ghost-busting tax agency which bases its audit strategy on signals of prosperous living, such as ownership of high-quality housing. Ghosts have a preference for high-quality housing, but may opt to own houses of a lower quality so as to escape detection. The paper compares the optimal audit rules and net tax collection under signal and blind auditing of the non-declaring population, deriving conditions under which each strategy will dominate the other.

Suggested Citation

  • Gideon Yaniv, 2003. "Auditing ghosts by prosperity signals," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 8(9), pages 1-10.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-03h20002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/EB/2003/Volume8/EB-03H20002A.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gideon Yaniv, 2010. "The Red–Green Channel Dilemma: Customs Declaration and Optimal Inspection Policy," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(3), pages 482-492, August.
    2. Roberto José Arias, 2004. "Reglas de selección para la fiscalización de Impuestos a las Ventas," Revista de Economía y Estadística, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto de Economía y Finanzas, vol. 42(2), pages 29-62, Diciembre.
    3. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Hamid Beladi, 2010. "A Theoretical Analysis of Income Tax Evasion, Optimal Auditing, and Credibility in Developing Countries," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 22(1), pages 123-133, January.
    4. Dimitri Romanov, 2003. "Costs and Benefits of Marginal Reallocation of Tax Agency Resources in Pursuit of the Hard-to-Tax," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0323, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-03h20002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.