IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

A A method of choice of the best alternative in the multiple solutions case in the Games Theory


  • Catalin Angelo Ioan

    () (Danubius University of Galati)

  • Gina Ioan

    () (Danubius University of Galati)


In the game theory, there are a classic series of four criteria: Wald, Hurwicz, Savage, Laplace with a special importance in the choice of optimal decision in the situations of uncertainty. These criteria providing reasonable answers from different points of view. The question is to discern between different choices when the criteria do not provide a unique answer. In this paper, we present a possible way to reduce the final number of variants.

Suggested Citation

  • Catalin Angelo Ioan & Gina Ioan, 2011. "A A method of choice of the best alternative in the multiple solutions case in the Games Theory," The Journal of Accounting and Management, Danubius University of Galati, issue 1, pages 5-8, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:dug:jaccma:y:2011:i:1:p:5-8

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. repec:spr:cejnor:v:25:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10100-016-0458-3 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Helena Gaspars-Wieloch, 2015. "On a decision rule supported by a forecasting stage based on the decision maker’s coefficient of optimism," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(3), pages 579-594, September.

    More about this item


    games theory; Wald; Savage; Hurwicz; Laplace; decision;


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:jaccma:y:2011:i:1:p:5-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Florian Nuta). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.