A A method of choice of the best alternative in the multiple solutions case in the Games Theory
In the game theory, there are a classic series of four criteria: Wald, Hurwicz, Savage, Laplace with a special importance in the choice of optimal decision in the situations of uncertainty. These criteria providing reasonable answers from different points of view. The question is to discern between different choices when the criteria do not provide a unique answer. In this paper, we present a possible way to reduce the final number of variants.
Volume (Year): (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 (May)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/jam|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:jaccma:y:2011:i:1:p:5-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Florian Nuta)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.