IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2013i4p332-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Methodology of Community Regional Funds

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Antonescu

    (Institute of National Economy – Romanian Academy, Bicharest, Romania)

Abstract

The evaluation process is a basic element of modern public sector management practice. If this process is well conducted, it can contribute to improved public interventions, increased transparency, accountability and cost-effectiveness. In the European Union, old Member States have a relatively long record of conducting evaluations and acting on their results, especially regarding Structural Funds. For Romania and other new Member States, this process is being introduced increasingly, in particular, after integration. The study has a major key-objective: to present the main categories of evaluation used for assessing the Structural Fund expenditure and the logical framework process and to examine how the evaluation co-financed public programmes is organized and conducted in the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Antonescu, 2013. "Evaluating Methodology of Community Regional Funds," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 9(4), pages 332-347, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2013:i:4:p:332-347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/1808
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reiner Martin, 1998. "Regional Incentive Spending for European Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 527-536, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandy Dall’erba, 2005. "Distribution of regional income and regional funds in Europe 1989–1999: An exploratory spatial data analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 39(1), pages 121-148, March.
    2. Stavros Rodokanakis, 2006. "“How Effective are the Regional Policies of Convergence in the EU?”," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3-4), pages 59-74.
    3. Gezici, Ferhan, 2000. "Structure And Performance Of The Clusters As Sample Provinces In Turkey With Respect To Regional Development," ERSA conference papers ersa00p354, European Regional Science Association.
    4. Florence Bouvet & Sandy Dall'Erba, 2010. "European Regional Structural Funds: How Large is the Influence of Politics on the Allocation Process?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 501-528, June.
    5. Konstantinos A Melachroinos, 2002. "European Integration and the Spatial Dynamics of Manufacturing-Employment Change," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(11), pages 2017-2036, November.
    6. Pedro B. Moyano & Guillermo Aleixandre & Olga Ogando, 2004. "The Spanish Regional Policy: an assessment of economic incentives during the period 1988-2003," ERSA conference papers ersa04p433, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Stavros RODOKANAKIS, 2003. "The Impact Of The European Structural Policies On The Eu Member States From 1988 To 2000," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 17, pages 181-209.
    8. Susana IRANZO, 2010. "Trade Liberalization, Agglomeration and Public Policies: the Case of the European Regional Policies," EcoMod2004 330600070, EcoMod.
    9. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:501-528 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2013:i:4:p:332-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.