IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwwob/83-21-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Einstellungen der BürgerInnen in Deutschland zur Aufnahme von Geflüchteten

Author

Listed:
  • Jürgen Gerhards
  • Silke Hans
  • Jürgen Schupp

Abstract

Since the beginning of 2016, the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) study has been conducting a monthly survey of German attitudes, expectations, and fears concerning migration. The third wave of the survey, —the Barometer of Public Opinion on Refugees in Germany (Stimmungsbarometer zu Geflüchteten in Deutschland)—, conducted in March 2016, shows that more than half of all respondents still associate the influx of refugees with more risks than opportunities. Nonetheless, a clear majority (81 percent of respondents) are in favor of admitting refugees and those fleeing political persecution, in accordance with international law. At the same time, however, the majority are of the conviction that refugees should be sent back to their home country once their reason for leaving it no longer pertains. Only 28 percent of all respondents are in favor of allowing refugees who have already been living in Germany for some time to remain in the country even after the situation in their country oforigin has improved Seit Beginn 2016 untersucht das „Stimmungsbarometer zu Geflüchteten in Deutschland“ monatlich die mit dem Thema Migration verbundenen Einstellungen, Erwartungen und Befürchtungen der BürgerInnen in Deutschland. Die im März 2016 durchgeführte dritte Welle der Umfrage zeigt, dass weiterhin mehr als die Hälfte der Befragten mit der Flüchtlingszuwanderung mehr Risiken als Chancen verbindet. Trotzdem spricht sich eine deutliche Mehrheit von 81 Prozent der BürgerInnen für eine dem Völkerrecht entsprechende Aufnahme von Geflüchteten und Verfolgten aus. Zugleich plädiert die Mehrheit aber dafür, dass die Geflüchteten nach Erlöschen des Fluchtgrundes wieder in ihre Heimat zurückgeschickt werden sollen. Nur 28 Prozent aller Befragten sprechen sich dafür aus, dass Geflüchtete, die schon einige Jahre in Deutschland sind, auch dann hierbleiben dürfen, wenn sich die Situation im Herkunftsland gebessert hat.

Suggested Citation

  • Jürgen Gerhards & Silke Hans & Jürgen Schupp, 2016. "Einstellungen der BürgerInnen in Deutschland zur Aufnahme von Geflüchteten," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(21), pages 467-473.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:83-21-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.534432.de/16-21-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gert G. Wagner, 2016. "Methodenmix hilft beim Finden und Auswählen von sozialen Indikatoren: Anmerkungen zur Methodik des Regierungsprojektes "Gut leben in Deutschland"," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 874, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    2. Gert G. Wagner, 2016. "Methodenmix hilft beim finden und auswählen von sozialen Indikatoren - Anmerkungen zur Methodik des Projektes "Gut leben in Deutschland"," RatSWD Working Papers 260, German Data Forum (RatSWD).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Refugees; asylum seekers; public opinion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • D64 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Altruism; Philanthropy; Intergenerational Transfers
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:83-21-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.