IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwwob/82-47-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ausweitung der in der Rentenversicherung anrechenbaren Kindererziehungszeiten: Mütter pausieren nicht länger vom Job

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Haan
  • Andreas Thiemann

Abstract

One reason women normally have lower pensions than do men is that they take breaks from their careers to care for their children. To mitigate this, the statutory pensionis calculated taking into account childcare periods—that is, women acquire pension entitlements even though they are not paying into the pension system. This is to ensure a largely independent pension for mothers. However, the additional pension entitlements earned during childcare periods could also prompt mothers to take longer career breaks following childbirth, or to retire earlier. Thus the pension entitlements for mothers would then be reduced once again. How exactly does increasing the length of the pension benefit-eligible childcare period affect women’s postbirth career breaks? In the study at hand, DIW Berlin investigates this question by examining the effects of the 1992 pension reform, which extended the length of the pension benefit-eligible childcare period from one year to three years. The analysisis based on combined data from the German Pension Insurance and the Federal Employment Agency. The key finding: The reform has not caused women to change theduration of their career breaks. Einer der Gründe, weshalb Frauen meist geringere Rentenansprüche haben als Männer, sind familienbedingte Auszeiten vom Beruf. Um dies abzumildern, rechnet die Gesetzliche Rentenversicherung Kindererziehungszeiten an, während derer Frauen Rentenanwartschaften erwerben, obwohl sie nicht in die Rentenversicherung einzahlen. Dies soll den Müttern eine weitgehend eigenständige Alterssicherung garantieren. Die zusätzlichen Entgeltpunkte aufgrund der Kindererziehungszeiten könnten Mütter jedoch auch dazu veranlassen, längere Erwerbsunterbrechungen nach der Geburt einzulegen oder früher in Rente zu gehen. Auf diese Weise würden die Rentenansprüche für Mütter dann wieder reduziert. Wie genau wirkt sich eine großzügigere Berücksichtigung von Kindererziehungszeiten also auf die Erwerbsunterbrechung von Frauen nach der Geburt aus? Das DIW Berlin hat dies in der vorliegenden Studie anhand der Rentenreform des Jahres 1992 auf Basis kombinierter Daten der Deutschen Rentenversicherung und der Bundesagentur für Arbeit untersucht. Damals wurde die Kindererziehungszeit von einem Jahr auf drei Jahre ausgeweitet. Das zentrale Ergebnis: Die Reform hat nicht dazu geführt, dass Frauen die Dauer ihrer Erwerbsunterbrechung nennenswert verändert haben.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Haan & Andreas Thiemann, 2015. "Ausweitung der in der Rentenversicherung anrechenbaren Kindererziehungszeiten: Mütter pausieren nicht länger vom Job," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 82(47), pages 1119-1125.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:82-47-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.519906.de/15-47-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Natural experiment; female labour supply; pension benefit;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • D19 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:82-47-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.