IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/87-1-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soziale Normen als Instrument des Nudgings: ein Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Corinna Michel
  • Julius Schneider

Abstract

With the help of experiments, decision-making phenomena and cognitive biases can be examined more closely for their applicability as potential nudges in a controlled environment. These insights can shed light on how nudges can be applied effectively and efficiently, and where one should refrain from using them. Social feedback was used as an exemplary nudge in an online experiment. It is assumed, that social feedback can motivate subjects to be more productive. In the experiment, subjects had to slip into the role of a teacher and correct fictional dictations of students. Results of this experiment indicate that subjects generally corrected dictations faster if they had previously received negative social feedback. Likewise, those who were faster than the average, got slower after the intervention. However, there is also a downside to social nudging: subjects have made more mistakes during correction as a result of social feedback. Therefore it depends on the specific design of the social nudge, whether with its help, it is possible to achieve an overall positive effect on productivity. Mithilfe von Experimenten lassen sich Entscheidungen und kognitive Verzerrungen in einem kontrollierten Umfeld untersuchen. Erkenntnisse aus Experimenten können Aufschluss darüber geben, wie Nudges effektiv und effizient angewendet werden können und wo von deren Nutzung abgesehen werden sollte. In einem Online durchgeführten Experiment habenwir soziales Feedback als exemplarischen Nudge eingesetzt. Wir vermuten, dass soziales Feedback zu einer höheren Leistungsfähigkeit und Arbeitsproduktivität motiviert. In dem Experiment mussten Versuchspersonen die Rolle einer Lehrerin oder eines Lehrers einnehmen und fiktive Diktate von Schülerinnen und Schülern korrigieren. Die Ergebnisse dieses Experiments weisen darauf hin, dass die Versuchspersonen Diktate schneller korrigierten, wenn sie nach Ablauf der ersten Hälfte des Experiments negatives soziales Feedback erhielten. Gleichsam wurden diejenigen langsamer, die in der ersten Hälfte des Experiments schneller waren als der Durchschnitt. Allerdings gab es auch eine Kehrseite des sozialen Nudgings: Versuchspersonen machten infolge des sozialen Feedbacks mehr Fehler. Es kam stark auf die spezifische Ausgestaltung des sozialen Nudges an, ob mit seiner Hilfe insgesamt ein positiver Effekt erzielt werden konnte.

Suggested Citation

  • Corinna Michel & Julius Schneider, 2018. "Soziale Normen als Instrument des Nudgings: ein Experiment," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 87(1), pages 119-131.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:87-1-9
    DOI: 10.3790/vjh.87.1.119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.87.1.119
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/vjh.87.1.119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Behavioral economics; social norms; experimental economics; online experiments; nudging;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
    • D89 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Other
    • D90 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:87-1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.