IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Wettbewerb und Regulierung jetzt auch in der Wasserwirtschaft?

Listed author(s):
  • Jürgen Kühling
Registered author(s):

    In the past, the Hessian Cartel Authority issued orders against water suppliers because they were charging excessively high prices and abused their dominant position. Those decisions were based on an analysis of comparable markets. These orders were upheld by the Federal Surpreme Court (BGH) on February 2, 2010. In this development one can see somewhat of a forerunner of a pricing regulation through antitrust law within the water industry. However, the following decision by the Cartel Authority of Baden-Wuerttemberg one year later, which was based on an analysis of the actual costs was only recently quashed by the Higher Regional Court (OLG) of Stuttgart. Considering the resulting insecurities regarding the application of the legal framework, the question arises, whether the water suppliers should be subjected to regulation by the Federal Network Authority - just like other network based industries, such as telecommunications, energy, post and railways. This paper comes to the conclusion that the current approach using the antitrust law is generally reasonable as a first step. What seems even more important than the choice between a sector specific regulation and antitrust law is to abolish the option of an administrative price control of public water suppliers which proved to be ineffective. Should the full application of cartel law, however, turn out to be ineffective in the future, a national sector specific solution should be considered. Die Verfügungen der Landeskartellbehörde Hessen gegen Wasserversorger wegen zu hoher Wasserpreise, die auf eine Vergleichsmarktanalyse gestützt wurden, und deren Bestätigung durch den BGH am 2.2.2010 waren erste Vorboten einer sich verschärfenden kartellrechtlichen Entgeltkontrolle der Wasserwirtschaft. Die folgende Entscheidung der Landeskartellbehörde Baden-Württemberg auf der Basis einer Kostenanalyse ein Jahr später ist dagegen unlängst vom OLG Stuttgart gestoppt worden. Vor dem Hintergrund der dadurch ausgelösten Unsicherheiten stellt sich die Frage, ob die Wasserwirtschaft nicht wie die anderen Netzwirtschaften (Telekommunikation, Energie, Post, Eisenbahntransport) auch einer Regulierung durch die in den übrigen Wirtschaftszweigen erfolgreich tätige Bundesnetzagentur unterworfen werden sollte. Der Beitrag gelangt zu dem Ergebnis, dass der kartellrechtliche Ansatz gegenwärtig sinnvoll ist und die Option auf eine abgabenrechtliche Kontrolle beseitigt werden muss. Sollte sich die kartellrechtliche Kontrolle jedoch nicht als wirksam herausstellen, so wäre eine bundeseinheitliche, sektorspezifische Lösung zu prüfen.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research in its journal Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung.

    Volume (Year): 81 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 183-200

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:81-1-12
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Mohrenstraße 58, D-10117 Berlin

    Phone: xx49-30-89789-0
    Fax: xx49-30-89789-200
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:81-1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.