IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fusions- und Kartellerleichterungen für Zeitungsverlage aus wettbewerbsrechtlicher Sicht


  • Franz Jürgen Säcker


Private press enterprises guarantee diversity of opinion in the print media sector. The article criticises attempts to loosen the merger control laws (sec. 36 German Law Against Restraints on Competition) and the prohibition of cartel agreements (sec. 1, 2 German Law Against Restraints on Competition) for the benefit of media companies. Instead it recommends abiding by the general prohibition on cartel agreements and the existing criteria for merger control intervention in order to secure diversity of opinion. Nevertheless, the FCO (Bundeskartellamt) may be well advised to reconsider its very narrow market definition. If a dominant position is created or strengthened by crossmedia effects, sec. 36 and 19 (2) German Law Against Restraints on Competition provide adequate criteria in order to assess conglomerate mergers of print and electronic media companies. Medienvielfalt im Bereich der Printmedien kommt über privatwirtschaftliche Verlagsunternehmen zustande. Der Aufsatz kritisiert Bestrebungen, die Bestimmungen über die Fusionskontrolle (§ 36 GWB) und das Kartellverbot (§§ 1, 2 GWB) zugunsten der Presseunternehmen aufzulockern, und rät zu unverändertem Festhalten am allgemeinen Kartellverbot und an den Eingriffskriterien der Fusionskontrolle, um die Meinungsvielfalt zu sichern. Lediglich die sehr enge Marktabgrenzung sollte vom Bundeskartellamt noch einmal neu überdacht werden. § 36 GWB liefert i.V. mit § 19 Abs. 2 GWB auch geeignete Kriterien, um konglomerate Zusammenschlüsse von Print- und elektronischen Medien zu beurteilen, wenn durch crossmediale Effekte eine marktbeherrschende Stellung entsteht oder verstärkt wird.

Suggested Citation

  • Franz Jürgen Säcker, 2005. "Fusions- und Kartellerleichterungen für Zeitungsverlage aus wettbewerbsrechtlicher Sicht," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 74(3), pages 19-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:74-3-3

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Ralf Dewenter & Björn Frank & Christian Wey, 2005. "Monopolalarm im Pressesektor: geplante GWB-Novelle schadet der Pressevielfalt," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 72(8), pages 147-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Oliver Budzinski & Katharina Wacker, 2007. "The Prohibition Of The Proposed Springer-Prosiebensat.1 Merger: How Much Economics In German Merger Control?," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 281-306.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:74-3-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.