IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v54y2026i5.html

The demography of loneliness: Rethinking social connections in population research

Author

Listed:
  • Hisrael Passarelli-Araujo

    (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG))

Abstract

Background: Loneliness is often treated as an individual or psychological experience, but it also reflects broader demographic and structural shifts. Population aging, declining fertility, migration, and shifting household arrangements have reshaped the ways individuals connect, care, and live. Despite its growing social relevance, loneliness remains under-theorized and under-measured in demographic research. Objective: This essay outlines why loneliness should be understood as both a consequence and a driver of demographic change. It examines how relational disconnection interacts with fertility, mortality, and migration across the life course, and offers a demographic framework for studying loneliness as a population process. Results: Loneliness emerges from demographic transitions (declining fertility, rising childlessness, increased longevity, and new migration regimes) that shape how people connect and care. In turn, loneliness influences demographic behaviors and outcomes, from reproductive intentions and union formation to survival, health, mobility, and return migration. These dynamics operate within cohorts and can accumulate across generations. Conclusions: Integrating loneliness into demographic models and data systems enhances the field’s ability to characterize population vulnerability and inform policy. Counting connection and disconnection alongside births, deaths, and moves improves our understanding on how people live and whether they thrive. Contribution: This essay contributes to demographic theory by articulating a framework that situates loneliness as both a cause and a consequence of demographic change. It bridges literatures on demography, well-being, and population dynamics to propose a demographic lens for understanding social disconnection across different contexts and life stages.

Suggested Citation

  • Hisrael Passarelli-Araujo, 2026. "The demography of loneliness: Rethinking social connections in population research," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 54(5), pages 133-158.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:54:y:2026:i:5
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2026.54.5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol54/5/54-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2026.54.5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary R. Lee & Alfred DeMaris & Stefoni Bavin & Rachel Sullivan, 2001. "Gender Differences in the Depressive Effect of Widowhood in Later Life," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 56(1), pages 56-61.
    2. Nicoletta Balbo & Francesco C. Billari & Melinda Mills, 2013. "Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 29(1), pages 1-38, February.
    3. Nguyen, Thomas P. & Al Asaad, Mariam & Sena, Michelle & Slewa-Younan, Shameran, 2024. "Loneliness and social isolation amongst refugees resettled in high-income countries: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    4. Louise C. Hawkley & Mary Elizabeth Hughes & Linda J. Waite & Christopher M. Masi & Ronald A. Thisted & John T. Cacioppo, 2008. "From Social Structural Factors to Perceptions of Relationship Quality and Loneliness: The Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 63(6), pages 375-384.
    5. Laura Bernardi & Andreas Klärner, 2014. "Social networks and fertility," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 30(22), pages 641-670.
    6. Ron Lesthaeghe, 2010. "The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 36(2), pages 211-251, June.
    7. Ricardo Pagan, 2020. "Gender and Age Differences in Loneliness: Evidence for People without and with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Mathias Czaika & Jakub Bijak & Toby Prike, 2021. "Migration Decision-Making and Its Key Dimensions," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 697(1), pages 15-31, September.
    9. Ronald Lee, 2003. "The Demographic Transition: Three Centuries of Fundamental Change," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(4), pages 167-190, Fall.
    10. Andreas Kuhn, 2018. "The complex effects of retirement on health," World of Labour, LISER, pages 430-430, March.
    11. Angelique Chan & Prassanna Raman & Stefan Ma & Rahul Malhotra, 2015. "Loneliness and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling elderly Singaporeans," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(49), pages 1361-1382.
    12. Lawrence, Elizabeth M. & Rogers, Richard G. & Wadsworth, Tim, 2015. "Happiness and longevity in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 115-119.
    13. Mara Getz Sheftel & Rachel Margolis & Ashton M Verdery & Jessica Kelley, 2024. "Life Events and Loneliness Transitions Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults Around the World," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 79(1), pages 31-38.
    14. Thijs van den Broek & Emily Grundy, 2017. "Loneliness among Polish migrants in the Netherlands: The impact of presence and location of partners and offspring," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(23), pages 727-742.
    15. Karen Mason, 1997. "Explaining fertility transitions," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 34(4), pages 443-454, November.
    16. Barjaková, Martina & Garnero, Andrea & d’Hombres, Béatrice, 2023. "Risk factors for loneliness: A literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    17. Gerst-Emerson, K. & Jayawardhana, J., 2015. "Loneliness as a public health issue: The impact of loneliness on health care utilization among older adults," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(5), pages 1013-1019.
    18. Bilecen, Başak & Vacca, Raffaele, 2021. "The isolation paradox: A comparative study of social support and health across migrant generations in the U.S," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    19. Katrijn Delaruelle, 2023. "Migration-related inequalities in loneliness across age groups: a cross-national comparative study in Europe," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizaveta Sivak & Paulina Pankowska & Adriënne Mendrik & Tom Emery & Javier Garcia-Bernardo & Seyit Höcük & Kasia Karpinska & Angelica Maineri & Joris Mulder & Malvina Nissim & Gert Stulp, 2024. "Combining the strengths of Dutch survey and register data in a data challenge to predict fertility (PreFer)," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1403-1431, October.
    2. Jesús Rodrigo-Comino & Gianluca Egidi & Adele Sateriano & Stefano Poponi & Enrico Maria Mosconi & Antonio Gimenez Morera, 2021. "Suburban Fertility and Metropolitan Cycles: Insights from European Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Barjaková, Martina & Garnero, Andrea & d’Hombres, Béatrice, 2023. "Risk factors for loneliness: A literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    4. Ermini, Barbara & Carlucci, Margherita & Cucci, Marianna & Rontos, Kostas & Salvati, Luca, 2024. "Suburban fertility and the role of local contexts in a Mediterranean country: A spatial exercise," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Vanessa Ibáñez-del Valle & Silvia Corchón & Georgiana Zaharia & Omar Cauli, 2022. "Social and Emotional Loneliness in Older Community Dwelling-Individuals: The Role of Socio-Demographics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Chiara Ludovica Comolli, 2017. "The fertility response to the Great Recession in Europe and the United States: Structural economic conditions and perceived economic uncertainty," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(51), pages 1549-1600.
    7. David Lam, 2011. "How the World Survived the Population Bomb: Lessons From 50 Years of Extraordinary Demographic History," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 48(4), pages 1231-1262, November.
    8. Fox, Jonathan & Klüsener, Sebastian & Myrskylä, Mikko, 2018. "Is a positive relationship between fertility and economic development emerging at the sub-national regional level? Theoretical considerations and evidence from Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 88295, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Andrés F. Castro Torres, 2020. "Analysis of Latin American fertility change in terms of probable social classes," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2020-001, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    10. Kashnitsky, Ilya & de Beer, Joop & van Wissen, Leo, 2017. "Decomposition of regional convergence in population aging across Europe," OSF Preprints ykqbv, Center for Open Science.
    11. Andrés Felipe Castro Torres, 2021. "Analysis of Latin American Fertility in Terms of Probable Social Classes," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 37(2), pages 297-339, April.
    12. Olivia Sagan, 2025. "Loneliness, Social Cohesion, and the Role of Art Making," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Gianluca Egidi & Luca Salvati & Andrea Falcone & Giovanni Quaranta & Rosanna Salvia & Renata Vcelakova & Antonio Giménez-Morera, 2021. "Re-Framing the Latent Nexus between Land-Use Change, Urbanization and Demographic Transitions in Advanced Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Daniele Vignoli & Valentina Tocchioni & Ester Lazzari & Marco Cozzani, 2026. "Polarization and Flexibility in Attitudes Toward Assisted Reproduction: A Vignette Study," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2026_02, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    15. Jonathan Fox & Sebastian Klüsener & Mikko Myrskylä, 2019. "Is a Positive Relationship Between Fertility and Economic Development Emerging at the Sub-National Regional Level? Theoretical Considerations and Evidence from Europe," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(3), pages 487-518, July.
    16. Hippolyte d’ALBIS & Paula E. GOBBI & Angela GREULICH, 2017. "Having a Second Child and Access to Childcare : Evidence from European Countries," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 83(2), pages 177-210, June.
    17. Johannes Beller, 2024. "Social Inequalities in Loneliness: Disentangling the Contributions of Education, Income, and Occupation," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    18. Francesco C. Billari & Osea Giuntella & Luca Stella, 2019. "Does broadband Internet affect fertility?," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(3), pages 297-316, September.
    19. Kostas Rontos & Luca Salvati, 2020. "Space Matters? Exploring Gender Differentials in the Age at Marriage, Greece (1980–2017)," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Sam Hyun Yoo & Victor Agadjanian, 2021. "The paradox of change: Religion and fertility decline in South Korea," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(23), pages 537-562.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:54:y:2026:i:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.