IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v53y2025i20.html

Socio-economic differences in ART treatment success: Evidence from Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Cozzani

    (Università degli Studi di Firenze)

  • Daniele Vignoli

    (Università degli Studi di Firenze)

  • Valentina Tocchioni

    (Università degli Studi di Firenze)

  • Maria Elisabetta Coccia

    (Careggi University Hospital)

  • Emilia Giusti

    (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna)

  • Sara Landini

    (Università degli Studi di Firenze)

  • Francesca Piazzini

    (Careggi University Hospital)

Abstract

Background: Several studies have shown stark socioeconomic disparities in births resulting from assisted reproduction technology (ART), but only a few have investigated the underlying causes. An explanation may be possible inequalities in ART treatment success. Objective: This study investigates whether there are disparities in ART treatment success. We use observational data from women undergoing ART treatment at the ART center at Careggi Hospital in Florence. We analyze three outcomes: the probability of conception following ART, the probability of a miscarriage after conception, and the probability of a live birth. We further examine these disparities across population subgroups, including first-time or last-time patients, Italian-born individuals, and different age groups. Methods: We estimate baseline and adjusted logistic models and display predicted probabilities. Results: The results show no socioeconomic disparities between more and less advantaged patients in any of the outcomes considered. These findings are consistent across all the subgroups we investigated. Contribution: We explore a possible mechanism underlying ART birth disparities and highlight that these disparities do not appear to arise from treatment success, at least when treatments are performed in a widely subsidized public context in Italy.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Cozzani & Daniele Vignoli & Valentina Tocchioni & Maria Elisabetta Coccia & Emilia Giusti & Sara Landini & Francesca Piazzini, 2025. "Socio-economic differences in ART treatment success: Evidence from Italy," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 53(20), pages 611-628.
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:20
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol53/20/53-20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.20?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valentina Tocchioni & Anna Rybińska & Monika Mynarska & Anna Matysiak & Daniele Vignoli, 2022. "Life-Course Trajectories of Childless Women: Country-Specific or Universal?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(5), pages 1315-1332, December.
    2. Geronimus, Arline T., 1996. "Black/white differences in the relationship of maternal age to birthweight: A population-based test of the weathering hypothesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 589-597, February.
    3. Groes, Fane & Houstecka, Anna & Iorio, Daniela & Santaeulà lia-Llopis, Raül, 2024. "The Unequal Battle Against Infertility: Theory and Evidence from IVF Success," CEPR Discussion Papers 18766, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Alice Goisis & Wendy Sigle-Rushton, 2014. "Childbearing Postponement and Child Well-being: A Complex and Varied Relationship?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(5), pages 1821-1841, October.
    5. Ester Lazzari & Edith Gray & Georgina Chambers, 2021. "The contribution of assisted reproductive technology to fertility rates and parity transition: An analysis of Australian data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(35), pages 1081-1096.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:vseq2_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Cozzani, Marco & Coccia, Maria Elisabetta & Giusti, Emilia & Landini, Sara & Piazzini, Francesca & , Valentina & Vignoli, Daniele, 2024. "No socio-economic differences in ART treatment success: Evidence from Careggi Hospital, Italy," SocArXiv vseq2, Center for Open Science.
    3. Marco Cozzani & Maria Elisabetta Coccia & Emilia Giusti & Sara Landini & Francesca Piazzini & Valentina Tocchioni & Daniele Vignoli, 2024. "No socio-economic differences in ART treatment success: Evidence from Careggi Hospital, Italy," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2024_04, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    4. Alice Goisis, 2023. "Maternal Age at First Birth and Parental Support: Evidence From the UK Millennium Cohort Study," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(5), pages 1-33, October.
    5. Kravdal, Øystein, 2016. "New evidence about effects of reproductive variables on child mortality in sub-Saharan Africa," Memorandum 17/2016, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    6. Sigle, Wendy, 2021. "Demography’s theory and approach: (how) has the view from the margins changed?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112467, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Brown, Laura J & Sear, Rebecca, 2020. "Do parenting, reproductive and health traits cluster together in distinct trajectories? Evidence from two UK cohort studies," OSF Preprints r8jvw, Center for Open Science.
    8. Mathias Jensen & Abigail Adams & Barbara Petrongolo, 2024. "Birth Timing and Spacing: Implications for Parental Leave Dynamics and Child Penalties," Economics Series Working Papers 1048, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    9. Helen Lee & Sarah Shea Crowne & Melanie Estarziau & Keith Kranker & Charles Michalopoulos & Anne Warren & Tod Mijanovich & Jill H. Filene & Anne Duggan & Virginia Knox, "undated". "The Effects of Home Visiting on Prenatal Health, Birth Outcomes, and Health Care Use in the First Year of Life: Final Implementation and Impact Findings from the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Progra," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a9626a8d90bf4f01811d0c9d7, Mathematica Policy Research.
    10. Johnson, Rucker C. & Schoeni, Robert F. & Rogowski, Jeannette A., 2012. "Health disparities in mid-to-late life: The role of earlier life family and neighborhood socioeconomic conditions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(4), pages 625-636.
    11. Slaughter-Acey, Jaime C. & Brown, Tony N. & Keith, Verna M. & Dailey, Rhonda & Misra, Dawn P., 2020. "A tale of two generations: Maternal skin color and adverse birth outcomes in Black/African American women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    12. Bijlsma, Maarten J. & Wilson, Ben, 2020. "Modelling the socio-economic determinants of fertility: a mediation analysis using the parametric g-formula," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102414, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Ajay Pandey & Vinod Singh & Richa Sharma, 2025. "Does Weathering Explain Low Birth Weight in Uttar Pradesh? Findings From NFHS-5," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(3), pages 1-38, January.
    14. Abad, Nicolas & Etner, Johanna & Raffin, Natacha & Seegmuller, Thomas, 2025. "New fertility patterns: The role of human versus physical capital," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    15. Rucker C. Johnson, 2018. "Addressing Racial Health Disparities: Looking Back to Point the Way Forward," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 680(1), pages 132-171, November.
    16. Sepideh Yousefzadeh & Mario Biggeri & Caterina Arciprete & Hinke Haisma, 2019. "A Capability Approach to Child Growth," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 12(2), pages 711-731, April.
    17. Olivetti, Claudia & Pan, Jessica & Petrongolo, Barbara, 2024. "The evolution of gender in the labor market," Handbook of Labor Economics,, Elsevier.
    18. Katherine Tierney & Ester Lazzari, 2024. "Impacts of COVID-19 on Medically Assisted Live Birth Rates in the United States in 2020 and 2021," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 43(1), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Arthur L. Greil & Desmond D. Wallace & Jasmin Passet-Wittig & Julia McQuillan & Martin Bujard & Michele H. Lowry, 2024. "Self-Perceived Infertility is Not Always Associated with Having Fewer Children: Evidence from German Panel Data," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 40(1), pages 1-26, December.
    20. Malat, Jennifer R. & van Ryn, Michelle & Purcell, David, 2006. "Race, socioeconomic status, and the perceived importance of positive self-presentation in health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2479-2488, May.
    21. Acevedo-Garcia, Dolores & Soobader, Mah-J. & Berkman, Lisa F., 2007. "Low birthweight among US Hispanic/Latino subgroups: The effect of maternal foreign-born status and education," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 2503-2516, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.