IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v53y2025i12.html

The distortion of fertility due to migration: A comparative analysis of migrants in the Netherlands and stayers in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Nasim Ahamed Mondal

    (Uniwersytet Warszawski)

  • Agnieszka Fihel

    (Uniwersytet Warszawski)

  • Weronika Kloc-Nowak

    (Uniwersytet Warszawski)

Abstract

Background: Several studies have shown that migrants from Central and Eastern Europe to Western Europe experience an increase in fertility after migration. The literature on migrants’ childbearing patterns offers several explanations for this phenomenon. Objective: This study examines the childbearing of Polish women who migrated to the Netherlands, comparing their fertility to that of non-mobile Polish women. Methods: Using the Families of Poles in the Netherlands (FPN) survey and the Generations and Gender Survey (GGS) for Poland, we calculate the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) and average number of children for Polish female migrants in the Netherlands by cohort, socio-demographic characteristics and declared migration objective. Results: The TFR for Polish migrants, standardised according to the sending population distribution by age, education, partnership status and region of origin, was 1.02. Before and in the year of migration, their TFR was 0.87. Already in the first year after migration, the TFR increased to 1.76 and remained elevated, especially for family migrants, but declined considerably in the fourth year after migration. Conclusions: Controlling for observable socio-demographic differences between migrants and the sending population does not explain the differences in fertility. Family migrants experienced an increase in fertility after migration, suggesting an interrelation between mobility and childbearing timing. Women declaring other reasons for migration experienced a smaller and less sustained increase in fertility. Childbearing patterns were most distorted for those who migrated during peak childbearing years. Contribution: For Polish women in the Netherlands, periodic fertility measures are inflated due to tempo distortions in the early years after migration, which conceals different childbearing patterns for different types of migration.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasim Ahamed Mondal & Agnieszka Fihel & Weronika Kloc-Nowak, 2025. "The distortion of fertility due to migration: A comparative analysis of migrants in the Netherlands and stayers in Poland," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 53(12), pages 325-342.
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:12
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol53/12/53-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.12?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allan Puur & Sergei Zakharov & Luule Sakkeus & Liili Abuladze & Leen Rahnu, 2017. "Childbearing among first- and second-generation Russians in Estonia against the background of the sending and host countries," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(41), pages 1209-1254.
    2. Gunnar Andersson & Boris Sobolev, 2013. "Small Effects of Selective Migration and Selective Survival in Retrospective Studies of Fertility," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 29(3), pages 345-354, August.
    3. Hill Kulu, 2005. "Migration and Fertility: Competing Hypotheses Re-examined," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 21(1), pages 51-87, March.
    4. Jonathan Lindström & Eleonora Mussino & Livia Sz. Oláh, 2022. "Childbearing among Polish migrant women and their descendants in Sweden: an origin-destination country approach," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 133-155, March.
    5. Ben Wilson, 2020. "Understanding How Immigrant Fertility Differentials Vary over the Reproductive Life Course," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(3), pages 465-498, July.
    6. James Robards & Ann Berrington, 2016. "The fertility of recent migrants to England and Wales," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 34(36), pages 1037-1052.
    7. Jan M. Hoem & Michaela R. Kreyenfeld, 2006. "Anticipatory analysis and its alternatives in life-course research. Part 2: Marriage and first birth," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2006-007, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben Wilson, 2020. "Understanding How Immigrant Fertility Differentials Vary over the Reproductive Life Course," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(3), pages 465-498, July.
    2. Hill Kulu & Nadja Milewski & Tina Hannemann & Julia Mikolai, 2019. "A decade of life-course research on fertility of immigrants and their descendants in Europe," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(46), pages 1345-1374.
    3. Joseph Harrison & Hill Kulu & Katherine Keenan & Frank Sullivan, 2023. "Union formation and fertility amongst immigrants from Pakistan and their descendants in the United Kingdom: A multichannel sequence analysis," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(10), pages 271-320.
    4. Marianne Tønnessen, 2020. "Declined Total Fertility Rate Among Immigrants and the Role of Newly Arrived Women in Norway," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(3), pages 547-573, July.
    5. Bernard Baffour & James Raymer & Ann Evans, 2023. "Recent Trends in Immigrant Fertility in Australia," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 47-67, March.
    6. Nadja Milewski, 2010. "Immigrant fertility in West Germany: Is there a socialization effect in transitions to second and third births? [Fécondité des immigrées en Allemagne de l’Ouest: existe-t-il un effet de la socializ," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 26(3), pages 297-323, August.
    7. David Clifford, 2009. "Spousal separation, selectivity and contextual effects: exploring the relationship between international labour migration and fertility in post-Soviet Tajikistan," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 21(32), pages 945-975.
    8. Sanan Abdullayev & Allan Puur, 2024. "Varying responses to the introduction of earnings-related benefits: a study of 2004 parental leave reform in Estonia," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 1-31, December.
    9. Thaís García-Pereiro & Ana Paterno, 2024. "Comparison of short-term fertility intentions of albanian women in Italy with non-migrants in Albania and italian women," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 33(3), pages 999-1024, July.
    10. Katharina Wolf, 2016. "Marriage Migration Versus Family Reunification: How Does the Marriage and Migration History Affect the Timing of First and Second Childbirth Among Turkish Immigrants in Germany?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 32(5), pages 731-759, December.
    11. Marika Jalovaara & Gunnar Andersson, 2018. "Disparities in Children’s Family Experiences by Mother’s Socioeconomic Status: The Case of Finland," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 37(5), pages 751-768, October.
    12. Roberto Impicciatore & Giuseppe Gabrielli & Anna Paterno, 2020. "Migrants’ Fertility in Italy: A Comparison Between Origin and Destination," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(4), pages 799-825, September.
    13. Jan M. Hoem, 2014. "The dangers of conditioning on the time of occurrence of one demographic process in the analysis of another," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(2), pages 151-159, July.
    14. Hill Kulu & Fiona Steele, 2013. "Interrelationships Between Childbearing and Housing Transitions in the Family Life Course," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(5), pages 1687-1714, October.
    15. Anja Vatterrott, 2015. "Socialisation or Institutional Context: What Determines the First and Second Birth Behaviour of East–West German Migrants?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 31(4), pages 383-415, October.
    16. Hill Kulu & Nadja Milewski, 2007. "Family change and migration in the life course," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 17(19), pages 567-590.
    17. Marianne Tønnessen & Ben Wilson, 2023. "Visualising Immigrant Fertility -- Profiles of Childbearing and their Implications for Migration Research," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 23-46, March.
    18. Jan M. Hoem, 2013. "The dangers of conditioning on the time of occurrence of one demographic process in the analysis of another," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2013-006, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    19. Livia Ortensi, 2015. "Engendering the fertility-migration nexus: The role of women's migratory patterns in the analysis of fertility after migration," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(53), pages 1435-1468.
    20. Cordula Zabel, 2009. "Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 21(6), pages 135-176.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.