IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v52y2025i28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A parallel kinship universe? A replication of Kolk et al. (2023) with Dutch register data on kinship networks

Author

Listed:
  • Vera de Bel

    (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen)

  • Karsten Hank

    (Universität zu Köln)

  • Thomas Leopold

    (Universität zu Köln)

  • Eszter Bokányi

    (Universiteit van Amsterdam)

Abstract

Background: Kolk et al. (2023) use Swedish register data to provide a detailed numerical account of biological kinship. Applying their approach in other countries is challenging due to high data requirements. Objective: We examine whether Kolk et al.’s (2023) findings generalize to another demographically advanced country, the Netherlands, and assess how differences in cohort fertility and divorce rates influence the prevalence of different kin types. Methods: We analyze kinship network data for the entire Dutch population in 2018, focusing on ties to grandchildren, children, nieces, nephews, siblings, cousins, parents, aunts, uncles, and grandparents. Results: First, we find strong similarities between Dutch and Swedish kinship structures, extending the picture drawn by Kolk et al. (2023) to another demographically advanced Western context. Second, we show how the Dutch baby boom has trickled down across generations, leading to larger numbers of aunts, uncles, and cousins. Third, we show how differences in other family-related behaviors – specifically divorce and separation – shape the composition of kinship networks and cross-national differences, evident in a substantially lower number of half-siblings in the Netherlands than in Sweden. Contribution: This replication underlines the benefits of empirically validating kinship statistics derived from microsimulations and aggregate demographic data.

Suggested Citation

  • Vera de Bel & Karsten Hank & Thomas Leopold & Eszter Bokányi, 2025. "A parallel kinship universe? A replication of Kolk et al. (2023) with Dutch register data on kinship networks," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 52(28), pages 915-938.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:52:y:2025:i:28
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.52.28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol52/28/52-28.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2025.52.28?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judith A. Seltzer, 2019. "Family Change and Changing Family Demography," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(2), pages 405-426, April.
    2. Trude Lappegård & Elizabeth Thomson, 2018. "Intergenerational Transmission of Multipartner Fertility," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(6), pages 2205-2228, December.
    3. repec:dgr:rugsom:02f65 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Stéphane Cullati & Matthias Kliegel & Eric Widmer, 2018. "Development of reserves over the life course and onset of vulnerability in later life," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(8), pages 551-558, August.
    5. Sobotka, Tomás & Adigüzel, Feray, 2002. "Religiosity and spatial demographic differences in the Netherlands," Research Report 02F65, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhenyu Wang & Kinglun Ngok, 2024. "Non-coresidential intergenerational relations from the perspective of adult children in China: typology and social welfare implications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Maria Winkler-Dworak & Eva Beaujouan & Paola Di Giulio & Martin Spielauer, 2019. "Simulating Family Life Courses: An Application for Italy, Great Britain, and Scandinavia," VID Working Papers 1908, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna.
    3. Jan Kabátek & David C. Ribar, 2018. "Not your lucky day: romantically and numerically special wedding date divorce risks," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 31(4), pages 1067-1095, October.
    4. Martin Kreidl & Zuzana Žilinčíková, 2023. "Adult children’s union type and contact with mothers: A replication," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(23), pages 641-680.
    5. Linus Andersson, 2020. "Oh half-brother, where art thou? The boundaries of full- and half-sibling interaction," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(16), pages 431-460.
    6. Susan L Brown & Kagan A Mellencamp & I-Fen Lin, 2022. "Sole Family Survivors: Older Adults Lacking Family of Origin Kin," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(5), pages 930-935.
    7. Rodríguez Sánchez, Alejandra, 2019. "Family structure effects on U.S. children’s well-being? Re-examining the family instability hypothesis," OSF Preprints 84q56, Center for Open Science.
    8. Jan E. Mutchler & Nidya Velasco Roldán, 2023. "Economic Resources Shaping Grandparent Responsibility Within Three-Generation Households," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 461-472, June.
    9. Barbara Fulda, 2015. "Culture’s Influence: Regionally Differing Social Milieus and Variations in Fertility Rates," Working Papers id:6998, eSocialSciences.
    10. Tina Haux & Lucinda Platt, 2021. "Fathers’ Involvement with Their Children Before and After Separation," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 37(1), pages 151-177, March.
    11. Donna K. Ginther & Astrid L. Grasdal & Robert A. Pollak, 2019. "Fathers' Multiple-Partner Fertility and Children's Educational Outcomes," Working Papers 2019-062, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    12. William A.V. Clark & Daichun Yi, 2020. "Transitions to partnership and parenthood: Is China still traditional?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(6), pages 143-168.
    13. Sommet, Nicolas & Spini, Dario, 2022. "Financial scarcity undermines health across the globe and the life course," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    14. Guillaume Drevon & Philippe Gerber & Vincent Kaufmann, 2020. "Dealing with Daily Rhythms: Families’ Strategies to Tackle Chronic Time Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, September.
    15. David E. Bloom & Michael Kuhn & Klaus Prettner, 2024. "Fertility in High-Income Countries: Trends, Patterns, Determinants, and Consequences," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 16(1), pages 159-184, August.
    16. Joop Beer & Ingeborg Deerenberg, 2007. "An Explanatory Model for Projecting Regional Fertility Differences in the Netherlands," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 26(5), pages 511-528, December.
    17. repec:osf:osfxxx:84q56_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Aldrich, Howard E. & Brumana, Mara & Campopiano, Giovanna & Minola, Tommaso, 2021. "Embedded but not asleep: Entrepreneurship and family business research in the 21st century," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1).
    19. Hal Caswell & Xi Song, 2021. "The formal demography of kinship III: Kinship dynamics with time-varying demographic rates," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(16), pages 517-546.
    20. Lajos L. Brons, 2006. "Indirect Measurement Of Regional Culture In The Netherlands," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 97(5), pages 547-566, December.
    21. Giammarco Alderotti & Raffaele Guetto & Paolo Barbieri & Stefani Scherer & Daniele Vignoli, 2022. "Unstable Employment Careers and Completed Fertility before and after Labour Market Deregulation in Italy," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2022_03, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:52:y:2025:i:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.