IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/ejards/y2025i4p5-13.html

Assessment of Extent of Farm Mechanisation and Technical Efficiency of Cassava Production in Oyo State, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Olatunji A. Hamzat

    (Department of Agribusiness Management, Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria)

  • Muktarh A. Yusuf

    (Department of Agribusiness Management, Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria)

  • Oludare D. Taiwo

    (Department of Agribusiness Management, Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria)

  • Ayorinde Adesanlu

    (Department of Agribusiness Management, Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria)

Abstract

This study assessed the extent of farm mechanization and technical efficiency of cassava production in Oyo State Nigeria. The objectives were to profile the socio-economic characteristics of farmers, describe the extent of mechanization, and examine the effect of extent of farm mechanization on technical efficiency. Three hundred and seventy-two (372) cassava farmers sampled using a multi-stage sampling technique, and the data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Cobb Douglass stochastic frontier model. Findings indicated that 80 percent of those involved in cassava farming were men with average age and farm size of 53 years and 0.75 hectares respectively which indicates that it was dominated by the smallholders. Mechanization as a whole was low (9%), and little mechanization was adopted beyond land clearing and ridging with most other activities being done manually. Supporting the findings on the frontier estimations was the fact that farm size proved to be a determining factor in cassava production while experience, accessibility of credit and extension services reduced inefficiency. Extent of Farm mechanization was not statistically significant but it has a negative coefficient which implies that it reduces inefficiency when implemented. In the study, it is concluded that the levels of efficiency have been high together with structural limitations in credit, extension, infrastructure and mechanization. Such limitations if improved will boost cassava production.

Suggested Citation

  • Olatunji A. Hamzat & Muktarh A. Yusuf & Oludare D. Taiwo & Ayorinde Adesanlu, 2025. "Assessment of Extent of Farm Mechanisation and Technical Efficiency of Cassava Production in Oyo State, Nigeria," Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Doctoral Field Engineering and Management in Agriculture and Rural Development, issue 4, pages 5-13.
  • Handle: RePEc:ddj:ejards:y:2025:i:4:p:5-13
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35219/jards.2025.4.01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jards.ugal.ro/images/jards/journal/2025_4/Hamzat_et_al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35219/jards.2025.4.01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ikuemonisan, Edamisan Stephen & Akinbola, Adeyose Emmanuel, 2021. "Future Trends in Cassava Production: Indicators and its Implications for Food Supply in Nigeria," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 39(3).
    2. Abdulai, Awudu & Huffman, Wallace, 2000. "Structural Adjustment and Economic Efficiency of Rice Farmers in Northern Ghana," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 48(3), pages 503-520, April.
    3. Michael I. E. Edaba & Anthony O. Onoja & Zelda A. Elum, . "Analysis of Farm Credit Access Among Cassava-Based Farmers in South-South Nigeria," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 11(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Watkins, K. Bradley & Hristovska, Tatjana & Mazzanti, Ralph & Wilson, Charles E. Jr & Schmidt, Lance, 2014. "Measurement of Technical, Allocative, Economic, and Scale Efficiency of Rice Production in Arkansas Using Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 46(01), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Nay, Myo Aung, 2011. "Agricultural efficiency of rice farmers in Myanmar : a case study in selected areas," IDE Discussion Papers 306, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    3. Srinivasulu Rajendran, 2014. "Technical Efficiency of Fruit and Vegetable Producers in Tamil Nadu, India: A Stochastic Frontier Approach," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 11(1), pages 77-93, June.
    4. Zhihai Yang & Amin W. Mugera & Ning Yin & Yumeng Wang, 2018. "Soil conservation practices and production efficiency of smallholder farms in Central China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1517-1533, August.
    5. Bachev, Hrabrin & Mihailova, Mihaela & Terziev, Dimitar & Georgiev, Minko & Boevsky, Ivan & Dimova, Nadejda & Mikova, Rosiza & Zvyatkova, Daniela & Mitov, Anton & Petrov, Daniel & Asenov, Stefan & Iva, 2025. "Структура И Ефективност На Договорните Отношения В Селското Стопанство На България [Structure and effectiveness of contractual relations in Bulgarian agriculture]," MPRA Paper 127915, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Elodie Blanc & Aurelia Lepine & Eric Strobl, 2014. "Determinants of crop yield and profit of family farms: Evidence from the Senegal River Valley," Working Papers 2014-596, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    7. Acharya, Kamlesh Kumar & Malhotra, Ravinder & Sendhil, R & Kumari, Binita, . "Profit efficiency among peri-urban dairy farms in Odisha: an application of the stochastic frontier function," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 34(2).
    8. Matli, Mankaba M.W & Senyolo, Mmapatla P. & Nhundu, Kenneth & Belete, Abenet, 2023. "Enhancing smallholder sweet potato production and reducing susceptibility to inefficiencies in South Africa," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 364838, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    9. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2022. "Как Да Оценим Управленческата Ефективност На Българските Земеделски Стопанства [How to assess the governance efficiency of Bulgarian agricultural farms]," MPRA Paper 113590, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Maryam Asghari, 2012. "Environmental Kuznets Curve and Growth Source in Iran," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 59(5), pages 609-623, December.
    11. Abatania, Luke N. & Hailu, Atakelty & Mugera, Amin W., 2012. "Analysis of farm household technical efficiency in Northern Ghana using bootstrap DEA," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124211, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Illukpitiya, Prabodh & Yanagida, John F., 2010. "Farming vs forests: Trade-off between agriculture and the extraction of non-timber forest products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1952-1963, August.
    13. Chen, Zhuo & Song, Shunfeng, 2008. "Efficiency and technology gap in China's agriculture: A regional meta-frontier analysis," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 287-296, June.
    14. Bright O. Asante & Renato A. Villano & Omphile Temoso, 2024. "Drivers of integrated crop–livestock farming system’s efficiency for smallholder farmers in the forest-savanna transition agro-ecological zone of Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 29429-29451, November.
    15. Nguyen-Anh, Tuan & Hoang-Duc, Chinh & Tiet, Tuyen & Nguyen-Van, Phu & To-The, Nguyen, 2022. "Composite effects of human, natural and social capitals on sustainable food-crop farming in Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    16. Boubacar Balde & Hajime Kobayashi & Makoto Nohmi & Akira Ishida & Mohamed Esham & Emmanuel Tolno, 2014. "An Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Mangrove Rice Production in the Guinean Coastal Area," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(8), pages 179-179, July.
    17. Mohammed, Sadick & Abdulai, Awudu, 2021. "Extension Participation and Improved Technology Adoption: Impact on Efficiency and Welfare of Farmers in Ghana," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315362, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Shrabani Mukherjee & Kailash Chandra Pradhan, 2016. "Anatomy of Input Demand Functions for Indian Farmers across Regions," Working Papers 2016-150, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    19. Asante, Bright O. & Temoso, Omphile & Addai, Kwabena N. & Villano, Renato A., 2019. "Evaluating productivity gaps in maize production across different agroecological zones in Ghana," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. Abeyou W. Worqlul & Yihun T. Dile & Jean-Claude Bizimana & Jaehak Jeong & Thomas J. Gerik & Raghavan Srinivasan & James W. Richardson & Neville Clarke, 2018. "Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Simulated Small-Scale Irrigation Intervention: A Case Study in Dimbasinia Watershed, Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:ejards:y:2025:i:4:p:5-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.