IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/ejards/y2025i2p67-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of NSPRI Technological Innovations’ Adoption Among Users in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Adetayo Seun Ayodele

    (Research Outreach Department, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institutes, Ilorin, Nigeria)

  • Olatilewa Mufuliat Oladuntan

    (Research Outreach Department, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institutes, Ilorin, Nigeria)

  • Oyebamiji Isaac Tunde

    (Research Outreach Department, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institutes, Ilorin, Nigeria)

  • Aina Olusegun Babatunde

    (Research Outreach Department, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institutes, Ilorin, Nigeria)

  • Olabode Deborah Adedoyin

    (Research Outreach Department, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institutes, Ilorin, Nigeria)

  • Achime Chika Kennedy

    (Research Outreach Department, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institutes, Ilorin, Nigeria)

  • Owojaiye Biodun Oluwasonjo

    (Research Outreach Department, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institutes, Ilorin, Nigeria)

  • Adamu David Ahmed

    (Research Outreach Department, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institutes, Ilorin, Nigeria)

Abstract

The dearth of users’ feedback is the bane of innovation, improvement and popularization of NSPRI designed and developed postharvest technologies. Hence, this study sought to boost the improvement of NSPRI Technological innovations such as NSPRI Fish-Smoking-Kiln (NSK), Parabolic-Shaped Solar Dryer (PSSD), Iced Fish Box® (IFB), Hermetic Steel Drum (HSD) and Stackable-Ventilated Plastic Crate (SVPC) through feedback from the users. The study employed interview schedule to obtain primary data from 1049 beneficiaries of NSPRI disseminated technologies purposively selected from thirteen (13) out of the twenty-four (24) States where the technologies were distributed and promoted. Descriptive statistics (frequency count, percentages, and mean) and inferential statistics were used for data analysis. Results revealed that HSD has the highest (27.7%) number of users, while 3.27%, 21.26%, 24.12% and 23.64 of the respondents used SVPC, IFB®, PSSD, and NSK respectively. About 41.2% and 26% of users of the SVPC and IFB® reported that the quality of commodities during transit was maintained for an average of 13 and 24 hours, respectively. The utilization of all the technologies improved users’ income and increased their capacity to meet market demand. The majority of the users (VPC: 100%, IFB®:92.7%, NSK: 51.3%, PSSD: 74.9%, HSD: 86.9%) are willing to pay for the technology, albeit at varying amounts. Despite the relative advantages of the postharvest technologies as indicated by beneficiaries, several areas for improvement were highlighted for all the technologies except the IFB®. The NSK and IFB® had adoption rates of 56.45% and 50.22%, respectively while the PSSD, and HSD and SVPC had less than 50% adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Adetayo Seun Ayodele & Olatilewa Mufuliat Oladuntan & Oyebamiji Isaac Tunde & Aina Olusegun Babatunde & Olabode Deborah Adedoyin & Achime Chika Kennedy & Owojaiye Biodun Oluwasonjo & Adamu David Ahmed, 2025. "Assessment of NSPRI Technological Innovations’ Adoption Among Users in Nigeria," Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development Studies, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Doctoral Field Engineering and Management in Agriculture and Rural Development, issue 2, pages 67-75.
  • Handle: RePEc:ddj:ejards:y:2025:i:2:p:67-75
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35219/jards.2025.2.08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jards.ugal.ro/images/jards/journal/2025_2/Ayodele_et_al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35219/jards.2025.2.08?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:ejards:y:2025:i:2:p:67-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.