IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/metave/v4y2025ip164id164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing the Educational Process through AI and Gamified Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Marianna Zhumbei
  • Oleg Khairulin
  • Nadiia Buniak
  • Mykyta Sapohov
  • Svitlana Parfilova

Abstract

AI provides a wide range of tools for creating personalised learning paths and unlocking each student’s potential. The study aims to investigate the effectiveness of integrating AI tools into the educational process to form personalised learning paths. In the study context, the methods of self-assessment, analysis of learning outcomes, and statistical calculation of pedagogical experiment data processing were used. Criteria for the effectiveness of integrating AI into the educational process to develop personalised learning paths have been formed. Based on the outlined criteria and levels of their implementation, the most effective ones are identified through self-assessment. The tools for implementing these AI-based learning tools are outlined. The higher education students for whom the AI-based learning tools were used were divided into clusters according to their professional training: humanities, social sciences, and engineering. The pedagogical experiment compared the learning outcomes of the control group that used randomly selected AI tools and the experimental group that used AI-based learning tools, distributed according to the clusters of professional training. Based on the statistical comparison of learning outcomes, it was determined that the experimental group shows better results. Therefore, the preliminary analysis of AI-based learning tools and their further application by the clusters of professional training is practical.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:metave:v:4:y:2025:i::p:164:id:164
DOI: 10.56294/mr2025164
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:metave:v:4:y:2025:i::p:164:id:164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mr.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.