IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/metave/v1y2022ip14id14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric properties of an instrument to assess the level of knowledge about artificial intelligence in university professors

Author

Listed:
  • Camilo Andrés Silva-Sánchez

Abstract

Introduction: knowledge about AI in university professors allows them to integrate these technological tools into their teaching strategies and improve the quality of learning. Objective: to determine the sustainable factorial structure of the relationship dimension of an instrument to evaluate the level of knowledge about artificial intelligence in university professors. Methods: a cross-sectional metric validation study was conducted. A sample of 83 university professors was selected. An instrument on artificial intelligence for university professors was applied, consisting of 15 questions divided into three sections. Psychometric analysis was carried out to evaluate its validity and reliability. Results: the results show that Part 1 has an alpha coefficient of 0,77, Part 2 has an alpha coefficient of 0,65, and Part 3 has an alpha coefficient of 0,83. The alpha coefficients for each subscale (0,77 for Part 1, 0,65 for Part 2, and 0,83 for Part 3) indicate that the instrument has good internal consistency and that the questions within each subscale are related to each other. The χ2/gl ratio of 2,1 indicates a good fit of the model, and the GFI, NFI, and CFI values are close to 1, indicating a good fit of the model. Conclusions: the results of the present study support the validity, reliability, and sustainable factorial structure of the instrument on artificial intelligence for university professors, making it an appropriate tool to evaluate the level of knowledge about AI in university professors.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:metave:v:1:y:2022:i::p:14:id:14
DOI: 10.56294/mr202214
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:metave:v:1:y:2022:i::p:14:id:14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mr.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.