IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v3y2024ip620id620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construct validity of informational skills for the application of Scientometrics

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Rafael Araujo-Inastrilla
  • Mayelin Llosa Santana
  • Dayami Gutiérrez Vera
  • María del Carmen Lamazares Pérez
  • Tania Rosa González García

Abstract

Introduction: Scientometrics, as a key discipline in the metric studies of information, requires specific informational skills for its effective application. This study focuses on validating the theoretical construct of informational skills for the application of scientometrics, aimed at tutors of the Health Information Systems career. Objective: to validate the theoretical construct of informational skills for the application of scientometrics. Method: A quantitative study was carried out with tutors from the Health Information Systems career where exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) techniques were used to evaluate the factor structure of the construct. The analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 25 and IBM AMOS 25. Results: The EFA revealed a two-factor structure with acceptable factor loads (values between 0.77 and 0.98). The TFA confirmed a two-factor model with an adequate fit (comparative fit index = 0.906, goodness of fit index = 0.844). Factor 1 grouped technical-operational skills (identification, collection, and presentation of data), while Factor 2 included critical-analytical skills (search strategies, quality assessment, analysis, and evaluation). Bartlett's sphericity test (p = 0.000) and the KMO index (0.709) supported the suitability of the data for factor analysis. Conclusions: The construct of informational skills for scientometrics is valid, with a two-factor structure that reflects operational and critical-analytical skills.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:620:id:620
DOI: 10.56294/mw2024620
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:620:id:620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.