IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dbk/medicw/v3y2024ip573id573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges and opportunities of formative feedback in Ecuadorian education

Author

Listed:
  • Bismar Ariel Conde Arteaga
  • Johana Carolina Lastra Cordero
  • Jessica Viviana Peláez Álava
  • Leili Betty Segura Quiñonez
  • Narcisa Dolores Piza Burgos

Abstract

The study analyzed the importance of formative feedback in the self-regulation of learning by high school students in Ecuador. It was found that, despite the educational reforms that promoted active methodologies, their effective implementation still faced obstacles. Among the main factors that hindered their application were teacher overload, lack of training in feedback strategies, and resistance to methodological change. These elements limited the possibility of students reflecting on their learning and improving their study strategies. From a theoretical perspective, it was shown that self-regulation of learning was key to academic and professional success, as it allowed students to plan, monitor and evaluate their performance. It was evident that structured feedback favoured metacognition and autonomous learning, in contrast to traditional strategies. In the Ecuadorian context, the lack of didactic approaches based on feedback affected the development of critical thinking and student autonomy. Finally, it was concluded that the implementation of formative feedback strategies could improve the quality of education. It was suggested that teacher training and the use of technologies to personalize feedback would be essential to overcome existing barriers. In addition, the need to design educational policies that would facilitate their adoption was highlighted, with the aim of transforming education and preparing students for future academic and professional challenges.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:573:id:573
DOI: 10.56294/mw2024573
as

Download full text from publisher

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be available.

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:573:id:573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Javier Gonzalez-Argote (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mw.ageditor.ar/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.