IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dba/ejpher/v2y2026i1p21-28.html

Patient violence and and antibiotic abuse: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Fuyong

Abstract

Antibiotic abuse poses a critical public health challenge in China, with existing literature primarily emphasizing physicians' economic incentives as the driving force. This paper identifies a novel mechanism: patient violence as a catalyst for defensive antibiotic prescribing. Leveraging a violent incident at a top-tier Beijing hospital with a 95% patient satisfaction rating, we analyze over 67,000 electronic consultation records from an online platform where physicians' income derives solely from service fees-effectively isolating economic incentives from prescribing behavior. Using a difference-in-differences framework with physician and time fixed effects, we find that physicians in the affected department increase antibiotic prescriptions by 11.4 percentage points and non-prescription antibiotic guidance by 11.3 percentage points following the incident. These effects concentrate among patients expressing recovery expectations, with no significant impact on other patients, and decay within one week. Our findings reveal "appeasement behavior" as a distinct form of defensive medicine-physicians accommodate patient demands to mitigate conflict risk when clinical relationships become strained. The results underscore that antibiotic abuse is not solely an economic phenomenon but also a behavioral response to workplace violence, with important implications for antibiotic stewardship programs and patient safety policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Fuyong, 2026. "Patient violence and and antibiotic abuse: Evidence from China," European Journal of Public Health and Environmental Research, Pinnacle Academic Press, vol. 2(1), pages 21-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:dba:ejpher:v:2:y:2026:i:1:p:21-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/EJPHER/article/view/497/489
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:ejpher:v:2:y:2026:i:1:p:21-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/EJPHER .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.