Author
Abstract
The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed communication practices, professional expectations, and knowledge production in contemporary workplaces. These changes create new demands for higher education, particularly for Business English programmes that aim to prepare students for participation in global professional environments. However, current Business English curricula often remain grounded in conventional language-training models and fail to address AI literacy in a systematic and critical way. This paper critically examines the limitations of existing Business English curriculum design in relation to AI literacy and argues that the problem is not simply the absence of new content, but a deeper mismatch between curriculum knowledge, pedagogy, and workplace realities. Drawing on scholarship in AI literacy, English for Specific Purposes (ESP), and curriculum theory, the study identifies three interrelated problems: conceptual ambiguity surrounding AI literacy, pedagogical conservatism in Business English teaching, and insufficient alignment between curriculum materials and AI-mediated workplace communication. The paper proposes a reconceptualised framework for integrating AI literacy into Business English education through epistemic restructuring, pedagogical innovation, and socio-institutional collaboration. It argues that AI literacy should not be reduced to technical tool use, but understood as a critical, ethical, and communicative competence. The study contributes to debates on digital transformation in higher education by demonstrating how Business English curriculum reform can respond more effectively to technological change and global employability demands, while emphasizing the importance of developing students' critical thinking skills and ethical awareness in an AI-driven professional landscape.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dba:ejesaa:v:2:y:2026:i:1:p:90-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joseph Clark (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://pinnaclepubs.com/index.php/EJES .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.