IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Zur De-Pluralisierung der Wirtschaftswissenschaft nach 1970: Explorationen in einem wissenschaftlichen Macht- und Kampffeld

Listed author(s):
  • Arne Heise
  • Sebastian Thieme

In the context of ongoing criticisms of the lack of pluralism in economics, the present article aims to discuss the development of ‘heterodox’ economics since the 1970s. Following Lakatos’s concept of scientific research programs (srp), and concentrating on the situation in Germany, the article will discuss classifications of economics, and will specify the understanding of diversity in the light of ‘axiomatic variations’ of the economic mainstream. This will form the basis for the subsequent description of the development of heterodoxy in Germany, with special reference to the founding of new universities and the reform movements in the 1970s. It can be shown that the heterodox scene flourished in this period, but that this pluralization remained fragmented and short-lived; by the 1980s at the latest heterodoxy was again on its way to marginalization. The history of heterodoxy in Germany thus presents itself as an unequal ‘battle of the paradigms,’ and can only be told as the story of a failure. / Im Kontext der weiterhin anhaltende Kritik am mangelnden Pluralismus der Wirtschaftswissenschaften soll im vorliegenden Beitrag die Entwicklung der ,heterodoxen‘ Ökonomik seit den 1970er Jahren diskutiert werden. In Anlehnung an Lakatos’ Konzept der Forschungsprogramme und in Konzentration auf die Situation in Deutschland wird dabei die Wirtschaftswissenschaft klassifiziert und das Verständnis von Vielfalt im Lichte ,axiomatischer Variationen‘ des ökonomischen Mainstreams präzisiert. Darauf basie-rend folgt die Beschreibung der Entwicklung der Heterodoxie in Deutschland unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der universitären Neugründungen und Reformbewegungen in 1970er Jahren. Es lässt sich zeigen, dass die heterodoxe Szene in dieser Zeit eine Hochphase erlebte, diese Pluralisierung aber kleinteilig blieb und auch nur kurz anhielt, so dass die Heterodoxie spätestens ab den 1980er Jahren wieder auf eine Marginalisierung zusteuerte. Die Geschichte der Heterodoxie in Deutschland stellt sich insofern als ungleicher ,Kampf der Paradigmen‘ dar und muss als ,Misserfolgsgeschichte‘ erzählt werden.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/schm.135.2.155
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers (2008 onwards); Pay-per-view access from http://www.genios.de (2005 onwards) and http://ejournals.duncker-humblot.de/loi/schm (2008 onwards)

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Duncker & Humblot, Berlin in its journal Schmollers Jahrbuch.

Volume (Year): 135 (2015)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 155-187

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:dah:aeqsjb:v135_y2015_i2_q2_p155-187
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.duncker-humblot.de

Order Information: Web: http://www.duncker-humblot.de/index.php/zeitschriften/wirtschafts-undsozialwissenschaften/schmollersjahrbuch-1.html Email:


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dah:aeqsjb:v135_y2015_i2_q2_p155-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (E-Publishing-Team)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.