Author
Listed:
- Luis Germán Sánchez Méndez
(Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Quintana Roo, México)
- Teresa del Carmen Cabrera Gómez
(Instituto Tecnológico de Tapachula, México)
Abstract
Introduction: The study analyzes the influence of neuroscience on advertising strategies and its impact on consumer behavior. It examines how neuromarketing techniques, based on sensory and emotional stimuli, manage to capture unconscious attention and condition purchasing decisions, generating an ethical debate on manipulation and cognitive autonomy.Method: A qualitative approach with an exploratory design was applied, through semi-structured interviews with fifteen randomly selected consumers in face-to-face and digital environments. The questions addressed perceptions about sensory advertising, emotional reactions and ethical limits of neuromarketing. The information was analyzed in an interpretative way, identifying coincidences, contrasts and common meanings.Results: The responses showed that advertisements with visual, auditory and emotional components provoke immediate recall and desire to buy. However, most of the participants said they felt vulnerable to the excessive personalization of messages and acknowledged having made impulse purchases. Categories such as induced emotion, unconscious attention, purchase impulse, brand identification and perception of manipulation emerged, revealing an ambivalent relationship between pleasure and distrust towards current advertising.Conclusions: neuroscience applied to advertising enhances communicative effectiveness, but also poses ethical dilemmas about the consumer's mental freedom. It is concluded that critical training, business transparency and the development of a neuroethics of consumption are essential to balance innovation and respect for individual autonomy in the contemporary commercial environment.
Suggested Citation
Luis Germán Sánchez Méndez & Teresa del Carmen Cabrera Gómez, 2024.
"The relationship between neuroscience, advertising and consumer manipulation,"
NeuroData, Editorial JOGB, vol. 1, pages 1-51, January.
Handle:
RePEc:cxn:neurod:v:1:y:2024:id:51
DOI: 10.63688/neurodata202451
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxn:neurod:v:1:y:2024:id:51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jefferson Gutierrez (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://neuro.jogbeditorial.ec/index.php/neuro .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.