Author
Abstract
Introduction: For the Humanistic Technical Baccalaureate (BTH), mathematical evaluation must be relocated beyond reproducing procedures, and must also be able to prioritize the understanding, application and transfer of knowledge; knowledge that will have to be transferred to technical and socio-productive situations. Objective: To analyze inclusive evaluation practices and their link with mathematical performance indicators of students in the Educational District of La Paz 2 during the year 2026. Methods: A quantitative, non-experimental, cross-sectional, descriptive-relational study was conducted. The sample consisted of 300 teachers and 338 students selected through stratified sampling. A structured questionnaire was administered from which a Cronbach's alpha of 0.83 was obtained. Results: There was a convergence between teachers and students in the sense that if there were still memorized components in the assessment, there would be little relationship between grading and comprehension. Little incorporation of digital tools was observed and few possibilities of transferring mathematical learning to practical situations. Both actors preferred to solve real problems and to carry out projects of an applied type. Conclusions: Strengthening inclusive assessment requires expanding opportunities to demonstrate learning and explicitly linking Mathematics with the technical and socio-productive purposes of BTH.
Suggested Citation
Flavio García Condori, 2026.
"Inclusive assessment practices and mathematical performance among students in the Technical-Humanistic Baccalaureate,"
Medicion y Evaluacion del Aprendizaje Inclusivo, Facultad de Derecho, Ciencias Politicas y Sociales de la Universidad Tecnica de Oruro, vol. 3(2), pages 1-27, July.
Handle:
RePEc:cxn:evalua:v:3:y:2026:i:2:id:27
DOI: 10.63688/aprendizaje.v3.i2.27
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxn:evalua:v:3:y:2026:i:2:id:27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial JOGB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://evaluacionaprendizaje.org/index.php/meai .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.