Author
Listed:
- Francisco Javier Santini Rodriguez
(Universidad de Sonora. Hermosillo, México)
- Luis Carlos Rodriguez Montaño
(Universidad de Sonora. Hermosillo, México)
- Mario Isaac Romero Lamadrid
(Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo (CIAD). Hermosillo, México)
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial intelligence is capable of recognizing learning difficulties and adjusting assessments to the characteristics of the students. Objective: The aim of this study was to test the effects of artificial intelligence on the arrest of educational needs and the adaptation of assessment in improving the academic performance of students in Higher Basic General Education. Methodology: A quantitative, applied, explanatory-comparative and quasi-experimental study was carried out with pre-test and post-test. The population was 240 students and the sample was 148. The sample was divided into the experimental group and the control group: both groups of 74 students. The experimental group received adaptation of the assessment over the course of eight weeks while the control group continued the conventional procedure. Simulated data were used to structure the analytical model. Results: The experimental group improved 17.8 points in performance compared to the control group (6.3 points) with a large effect (d = 1.42). The presence of students with a high need for reinforcement went from 41.9% to 10.8% and satisfactory mastery increased to 63.5%. Conclusion: Personalized student assessment with Artificial Intelligence can help detect academic needs, adapt tasks and improve student performance under teacher intervention.
Suggested Citation
Francisco Javier Santini Rodriguez & Luis Carlos Rodriguez Montaño & Mario Isaac Romero Lamadrid, 2026.
"Application of artificial intelligence for the detection of educational needs and the personalization of evaluation processes,"
Medición y Evaluación del Aprendizaje Inclusivo, Facultad de Derecho, Ciencias PolÃticas y Sociales de la Universidad Técnica de Oruro, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, January.
Handle:
RePEc:cxn:evalua:v:3:y:2026:i:1:id:25
DOI: 10.63688/aprendizaje.v3.i1.25
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxn:evalua:v:3:y:2026:i:1:id:25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial JOGB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://evaluacionaprendizaje.org/index.php/meai .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.