IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxn/evalua/v3y2026i1id23.html

Evaluation of digital accessibility on public platforms for people with disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Leonidas Yance Carvajal

    (Universidad Estatal de Milagro. Milagro, Ecuador.)

  • Henry Luis Peñaherrera Veloz

    (Universidad Estatal de Milagro. Milagro, Ecuador.)

  • Franklin Max Gaibor Vera

    (Universidad Estatal de Milagro. Milagro, Ecuador.)

  • Juan Tarquino Calderón Cisneros

    (Ecotec University. Samborondón, Ecuador.)

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the digital accessibility of public platforms from the perception of people with disabilities in Bolivia and Ecuador. The research was developed under a quantitative approach, with a non-experimental, cross-sectional design and descriptive-correlational scope. The sample consisted of 128 people with disabilities who had used public digital platforms to consult information, carry out procedures or access institutional services. A structured survey with a five-level Likert scale was applied for data collection, organized into dimensions of ease of navigation, clarity of information, compatibility with assistive technologies, access to online procedures, autonomy of use, and perceived digital inclusion. Previously, a pilot test was carried out and the reliability of the instrument was verified by Cronbach's alpha, obtaining a value of 0.82. The results showed low and medium levels of digital accessibility, with greater difficulties in autonomous navigation, accessible forms, clear institutional language and technological compatibility. In addition, Spearman's correlation confirmed a positive and significant relationship between perceived digital accessibility and digital inclusion. It is concluded that the digital transformation of the public sector in Bolivia and Ecuador should strengthen inclusive design, the permanent evaluation of platforms and the participation of users with disabilities in improvement processes.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:cxn:evalua:v:3:y:2026:i:1:id:23
DOI: 10.63688/aprendizaje.v3.i1.23
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://evaluacionaprendizaje.org/index.php/meai/article/view/23
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://evaluacionaprendizaje.org/index.php/meai/article/download/23/25
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63688/aprendizaje.v3.i1.23?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxn:evalua:v:3:y:2026:i:1:id:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial JOGB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://evaluacionaprendizaje.org/index.php/meai .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.