IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cwk/ajocsk/2025-14.html

Environmental Risks in Mining Projects on Water Resource Contamination and Infrastructure Damage

Author

Listed:
  • Musolo Mukukai

    (University of Lusaka)

  • Mususu Kaonda

    (University of Lusaka)

  • Michael Kalumbu Nsefu

    (University of Lusaka)

  • Erastus Mishengu Mwanaumo

    (University of Lusaka)

Abstract

This study examined the environmental risks associated with mining activities in Chingola, Zambia, with a focus on water contamination, infrastructure degradation, regulatory effectiveness, and community participation. A mixed-method cross-sectional design was employed, combining quantitative data from 385 residents and qualitative insights from key informant interviews and focus group discussions. Structured questionnaires and interview guides were used to collect data, with quantitative results analyzed using SPSS and qualitative findings analyzed through thematic analysis. Findings revealed that 66.5% (n=256) of respondents observed changes in water quality - including unusual taste, smell, and color - while 52.2% (n=201) reported stomach-related illnesses, 43.1% (n=166) reported skin infections, and 32.2% (n=124) experienced respiratory symptoms. Chi-square tests confirmed statistically significant associations between proximity to mining sites and water-related health effects (p = 0.012). On infrastructure, 71.7% (n=276) of participants reported road cracks and potholes, while 49.9% (n=192) noted bridge deterioration. Significant associations were found between residence proximity and infrastructure degradation (p = 0.021). Despite existing environmental laws, only 33.0% (n=127) of respondents believed they were effectively enforced, and fewer than 30% had seen corporate ecological efforts such as water treatment or waste management. Only 16.1% (n=62) reported active participation in environmental governance, though 80.3% (n=309) supported more vigorous enforcement, 70.4% (n=271) favored awareness campaigns, and 63.4% (n=244) advocated for improved corporate accountability. Qualitative data reinforced these findings, highlighting a weak regulatory presence, poor corporate compliance, and minimal community involvement in monitoring. The study concludes that mining activities in Chingola pose significant environmental and public health risks, exacerbated by weak enforcement, low civic engagement, and minimal corporate responsibility. Recommendations include strengthening institutional capacity, improving safe water infrastructure, rehabilitating damaged roads, and institutionalizing community monitoring and education mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Musolo Mukukai & Mususu Kaonda & Michael Kalumbu Nsefu & Erastus Mishengu Mwanaumo, 2025. "Environmental Risks in Mining Projects on Water Resource Contamination and Infrastructure Damage," African Journal of Commercial Studies, African Journal of Commercial Studies, vol. 6(6).
  • Handle: RePEc:cwk:ajocsk:2025-14
    DOI: 10.59413/ajocs/v6.i6.15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijcsacademia.com/index.php/journal/article/view/388
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.59413/ajocs/v6.i6.15?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ştefănescu, Lucrina & Alexandrescu, Filip, 2020. "Environmental protection or subversion in mining? Planning challenges, perspectives and actors at the largest gold deposit in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azadi, Hossein & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina & Ozunu, Alexandru, 2020. "Special issue: Environmental risk mitigation for sustainable land use development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Camelia Botezan & Veronica Constantin & Monika Meltzer & Andrei Radovici & Alina Pop & Filip Alexandrescu & Lucrina Stefanescu, 2020. "Is There Sustainable Development after Mining? A Case Study of Three Mining Areas in the Apuseni Region (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, November.
    3. David Oliveros-Sepúlveda & Marc Bascompta-Massanés & Giovanni Franco-Sepúlveda, 2025. "Environmental and Closure Costs in Strategic Mine Planning, Models, Regulations, and Policies," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-29, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwk:ajocsk:2025-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Charles G. Kamau (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijcsacademia.com/index.php/journal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.