IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvv/journ6/v4y2017i3p234-243.html

How Borda voting rule can respect Arrow IIA and avoid cloning manipulation

Author

Listed:
  • Dany R. DOMBOU T.

    (University of Dschang, Cameroon - Department of Economic Policy Analysis, P.O. Box: 110 Dschang, Cameroon.)

Abstract

This paper proposes a new formulation of the Borda rule in order to deal with the problem of cloning manipulation. This new Borda voting specification will be named: Dynamic Borda Voting (DBV) and it satisfies Arrow's IIA condition. The calculations, propositions with proof and explanations are made to show the effectiveness of this method. From DBV, the paper presents a method to measure and quantify the magnitude of the shock due to change in irrelevant alternatives over a scale moving from 0 to 100.

Suggested Citation

  • Dany R. DOMBOU T., 2017. "How Borda voting rule can respect Arrow IIA and avoid cloning manipulation," Journal of Economics Bibliography, EconSciences Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 234-243, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cvv:journ6:v:4:y:2017:i:3:p:234-243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econsciences.com/index.php/JEB/article/download/1383/1390
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://econsciences.com/index.php/JEB/article/view/1383
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C60 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - General
    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvv:journ6:v:4:y:2017:i:3:p:234-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bilal KARGI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JEB .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.